THE FALL OF MAN is not a Downer, its simply a reflection
We all know the story of THE FALL OF MAN. Once one reaches bottom of THE FALL OF MAN the only thing LEFT TO DO is to rise.
THE FALL OF MAN, or the fall, used in Christianity to describe the fall of the first man and woman from a state of innocent obedience to God to a state of guilty disobedience.
Although not named in the Bible, as THE FALL OF MAN, the doctrine of the fall comes from a biblical interpretation of Genesis chapter 3… At first, Adam and Eve lived with God in the Garden of Eden, when the serpent tempted them into eating the fruit from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, which God had forbidden. After doing so, they became ashamed of their nakedness and God expelled them from the Garden to prevent them from eating from the Tree of Life and becoming immortal.
I find this interesting. As it appears mankind was never immortal from the beginning. Nor, did mankind have the knowledge of Good and Evil. Plus, why would GOD put these trees where mankind would be tempted to eat them? That is, if GOD want mankind to remain in their ignorance/nakedness.
My question to GOD is, Has Mankind reach the bottom,,, the end of its fall yet? Has GOD already cast humanity into the bottomless pit to fall for all eternity?
Repent!, he says,,,,,,,, Repent for what? Becoming Conscious of Good and Evil?
Down We Go
Most believe humanity is at the pinnacle of its existence. In essence, to date, man has evolved to its highest degree of knowledge and innerstanding thus far. The technology at present is the highest man has ever achieved. In retrospect, this isn’t the case.
When in fact,,, Man may still be experiencing, THE FALL OF MAN. Plus, and I am being positive here, humanity is not as Spiritual as it once was. When one looks into the past we find Modern Man cannot do the things that Ancient Man could. However, what is the climb down to one man, can be the climb up for another. It’s a matter of perspective.
The story of the Garden of Eden and THE FALL OF MAN represents a tradition among the Abrahamic peoples, with a presentation more or less symbolical of certain moral and religious truths written for the Jewish people. What this has to do with Humanity is questionable, since most of humanity is not Jewish. Therefore this Doowan Questions everything, thus assumes nothing.
THE FALL OF MAN is not to belittle ones belief. It’s simply a reflection of the story given to humanity. One can ask their own questions, and believe what they want to believe.
Truth is, some of these beliefs are over two thousand years old. Isn’t time we take a look at them to SEE if those beliefs still serve us on our Fall down/up from grace.
Genesis 3 New International Version (NIV)
THE FALL OF MAN
3.1.) Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat from any tree in the garden’?”
2.) The woman said to the serpent, “We may eat fruit from the trees in the garden,
3.) but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
4.) “You will not certainly die,” the serpent said to the woman.
5.) “For God knows that when you eat from it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil.” 6.) When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it. She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it.
7.) Then the eyes of both of them were opened, and they realized they were naked; so they sewed fig leaves together and made coverings for themselves. 8.) Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the Lord God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the Lord God among the trees of the garden.
9.) But the Lord God called to the man, “Where are you?” 10.) He answered, “I heard you in the garden, and I was afraid because I was naked; so I hid.” 11.) And he said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?” 12.) The man said, “The woman you put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it.” 13.) Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?” The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.” 14.) So the Lord God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, “Cursed are you above all livestock and all wild animals! You will crawl on your belly and you will eat dust all the days of your life. 15.) And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel.” 16.) To the woman he said, “I will make your pains in childbearing very severe; with painful labor you will give birth to children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.” 17.) To Adam he said, “Because you listened to your wife and ate fruit from the tree about which I commanded you, ‘You must not eat from it,’ “Cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat food from it all the days of your life. 18.) It will produce thorns and thistles for you, and you will eat the plants of the field. 19.) By the sweat of your brow you will eat your food until you return to the ground, since from it you were taken; for dust you are and to dust you will return.” 20.) Adam[c] named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living. 21.) The Lord God made garments of skin for Adam and his wife and clothed them.
22.) And the Lord God said, “The man has now become like one of us, knowing good and evil. He must not be allowed to reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life and eat, and live forever.”
23.) So the Lord God banished him from the Garden of Eden to work the ground from which he had been taken.
24.) After he drove the man out, he placed on the east side of the Garden of Eden cherubim and a flaming sword flashing back and forth to guard the way to the tree of life.
Wow, who’s the antagonist in this story? The snake? I think not. It becomes necessary to point out some interesting details in this story. Simply to see if the fruit is still working.
Besides the obvious that GOD has legs, and doesn’t like the heat of the day. What was GOD attempting to keep humanity from? The knowledge of Good and Evil, and the Tree of Immortality. Sow, not only were we ignorant, we weren’t immortal either.
GOD DAMN,,,, the punishment seems a little harsh. After all it was only the knowledge of Good and Evil that Adam and Eve ate. Oooops, sow Adam and Eve ate his fruit then realized they were ignorant/naked. Is the knowledge of Good and Evil what GOD considers sin or is it that we ate his fruit, and disobeyed GOD?
Another thing that stands out in this story is that GOD lied to Adam and Eve. 3.) but God did say, ‘You must not eat fruit from the tree that is in the middle of the garden, and you must not touch it, or you will die.’”
Sow, lying to your children is OK? Well did they die? NO!!! Why didn’t GOD take care of the problem right then and there? Because, he loves man and wanted to give man a way back to the garden. Interesting way to show ones love, verses (16 through 19). I think a time out may have done the trick, don’t you?
Ahhh, and what happen to the snake that told the truth. He gets to crawl on his belly and eat dirt. Plus, His head gets crushed. Yikes!!!!
In Gnosticism, the G is silent. The snake is thanked for bringing knowledge to Adam and Eve, and thereby freeing them from the Demiurge’s control. The Demiurge banished Adam and Eve, because man was now a threat. A threat to whom,,,, GOD? Really?
Demiurge, a being responsible for the creation of the universe, in particular.
(in Platonic philosophy) the Maker or Creator of the world.
(in Gnosticism and other theological systems) a heavenly being, subordinate to the Supreme Being, considered to be the controller of the material world and antagonistic to all that is purely spiritual.
In Philip Pullman’s, His Dark Materials series (1995, 1997, 2000), THE FALL OF MAN is presented in a positive light, as it is the moment at which human beings achieve self-awareness, knowledge, and freedom. Pullman believes that it is not worth being innocent if the price is ignorance and slavery. Of course, there are those who would disagree!
On The Way Down
According to archaeological studies, in the past man was at a much higher degree of consciousness with a much higher Technology (“science of craft”), as seen in ancient sites around the earth. Just look at the wonders they created with bronze tools….. LOL
Or how about this one…
Why some think it was aliens, and not ancient man, is beyond me. Ha, Ha, Ha! In Truth the evidence points to THE FALL OF MAN. Mans fall from what man once was, to what man is NOW.
What/Who caused THE FALL OF MAN is a mystery story. Who’s the author of your story? No doubt humanity has Fallen. What we do when we hit bottom makes the difference.
In that time, THE FALL OF MAN may have meant… Mankind was in the Autumn/Fall of its great year, thus mankind may still have its Winter, Spring, and Summer ahead resulting from the Persecution of the Equinox.
As with the cycle of seasons each having their turn. Therefore Humanity has its cycles. Since the Spring Equinox in March is the real start of the NEW YEAR, we have the spring and summer of this year to look forward too.
Some of Humanity live by a different calendar plastered on the walls of heaven. No matter which calendar you choose, it’s Time to lick our wounds, dust our selves off, and rise towards our Destiny.
Two thousand one hundred and fifty years later, THE WINTER OF MAN is over. We where knock down and knock out. However, HUMANITY IS ON IT’S KNEES, and the referee is still counting. Seven, Eight, Nine….
Ding!!!!, was that the bell, end of the round? Let’s call this fight off, you win GOD, my ears are ringing and I AM a little dizzy from THE FALL OF MAN.
The Spring of Humanity is just around the Corner according to the Zodiac. Or maybe your still FALLing.
Knowledge is Power Experience is Wisdom Your Power is Yours
After The Fall of Man we rise
The Fall of Man is not a problem when one has wings.
A long time ago, no one really knows how long ago it was. Rabbit was a brave and fearless warrior. Rabbit was befriended by Eye Walker, a witch. The witch and the rabbit spent much of their time together sharing and talking. The two were very close.
One day Eye Walker and Rabbit were walking along and they sat down on the trail to rest. Rabbit said, I AM thirsty. Eye Walker picked up a leaf and blew on it, and then handed Rabbit a water gourd that was made from the leaf. Rabbit drank the water, but didn’t say anything.
Then Rabbit said, I AM hungry. Eye Walker picked up a stone and blew on it. Changing the stone into a turnip. Which she gave to Rabbit to eat. Rabbit tasted the turnip and then ate the turnip with relish. (Not the pickled kind.) But still Rabbit didn’t say anything.
The two continued along the trail, which led into the mountains. Near the top. Rabbit tripped and fell and rolled almost to bottom. Rabbit was in very serious condition when Eye Walker finally got to him. She used a magic salve on Rabbit to heal his great pain and mend his broken bones. Again Rabbit didn’t say anything.
Several days later Eye Walker went searching for her friend. Searching high and low but Rabbit was nowhere to be found. Finally, Eye Walker gave up looking for Rabbit.
And then it Happened!
Quite by accident she met Rabbit one day. Eye Walker asked, Rabbit, why are you hiding and avoiding me? I Miss You?
Rabbit replied, Because I AM afraid of you. You frighten me. I AM afraid of your magic, as Rabbit cowered he stated, Leave me alone!
I see, said Eye Walker.
I have used my magical powers on your behalf and now you turn on me and refuse my friendship?
I want nothing more to do with you or your powers, countered Rabbit.
I hope we never meet! Rabbit continued, and that I never see you again. Rabbit never saw the tears in Eye Walkers eyes.
Enough, Rabbit, Eye Walker said!,
We were once great friends and companions, but no more. It is within my power to destroy you, but because of our past and the medicines we have shared together, I will not do this. But because of your words, from this day forward I have placed a curse upon you and your tribe. From now on, you will call your fears and your fears will come to you.
Be on your way, for the sweet medicines that bound us together as friends are now broken.
They parted ways.
Now Rabbit is the Caller of Fear. He goes out and shouts, Eagle, I AM so afraid of you. If Eagle doesn’t hear him. Rabbit shouts louder, Eagle, stay away from me. Eagle now having heard Rabbit, comes and eats him. Rabbit even calls bobcats, wolves, coyotes, and even snakes until they come.
This Vision shows. Rabbit medicine people are so afraid of tragedy, illness, disaster, and being taken, that they call those very fears to them to teach them lessons.
What you resist, will persist. What you fear most is what you will become. What you call will answer. We must stop talking about horrible things happening and get rid of (what if) from our vocabulary.
The Vision shows, we must stop worrying about the future or trying to exercise control over that which is not yet in form, (the future). And that we must let go of the past! Let go now! Write your fears down and be willing to feel them. Breathe into them, feel them running through your body. Than ground yourself, Plant into Mother Earth and Grow something as a give away. It could be the time to wait for the forces of the Universe to start moving again and rid our self of the feeling of being powerless.
Seeing this vision simply, rid yourself of any negative feelings, barriers, or duress. One cannot have their influence felt until one rearranges their way of feeling the present set of circumstances. Realize there is always a way out of any situation, because the universal force/spirit always creates. Creation moves on. It is the way in which one handles adversity that allows one to succeed or cut their loses. Take a hint from Rabbit. Burrow into a safe space to nurture ones self and release ones fears until it is time again to move into the pasture, clear of prowlers who want a piece of ones juicy energy.
At the waterfall of the AntiChrist.
When we see a waterfall, we think, feel, believe we see freedom of will and choice in the innumerable turnings, windings, breaking of the waves. To make a waterfall, everything is necessary each movement can be calculated mathematically. Thus it is with in human consciousness, if one were aware, one would be able to calculate each individual action in advance, each step in the progress of knowledge, each error, each act of malice. Oh, To be sure the acting man is caught in his illusion of volition. If the wheel of the world were to stand still for just a moment and an omniscient, calculating mind were there to take advantage of this interruption, one would be able to see into the farthest future of each being and describe every rut that wheel will roll upon. The acting man’s delusion about himself, is his assumption that free will exists. Which is also part of the calculable flow of the waterfall.
I looked for references of the actual word “Antichrist” in the King James Bible and found only these four. This was a surprise as this topic is of major concern to many who believe in the bible today! There are a number of implied references. I didn’t want to imply something into The AntiChrist that wasn’t there.
2 John 1:7
For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist.
1 John 4:3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
1 John 2:22
Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.
1 John 2:18
Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know, that it is the last time.
For the priest, the interpretation of the bible gives the supreme license for power. He/she sets them self up as the “saviour” of the physiologically handicapped, offering them a cure for their exhaustion and listlessness, which in reality, is only a treatment therapy which does not cure the roots of their suffering. It only feeds the suffering!
In contrast to the typical enlightenment view as noble, simple, new wave, elegant and grandiose. Could it be that we are grappling with pessimism? The universe in which we experience is the product of great interacting forces; but we neither observe or we don’t care.
What we put together as our conceptions of this world, never actually addresses the underlying realities of our spirit. Is it human destiny to be controlled by the darkest universal realities and, at the same time, to live life in a human dream-timeworld of illusions? Looking into the abyss of human suffering and affirming it, passionately and joyously affirmed the meaning of our existence.
Will we never know ourselves to be infinitely more than just petty individuals, Tyrants ourselves? Finding our self-affirmation not in another life, not in a world to come, but in the ecstasy and joy of the world in which we currently reflect.
The birth of Christianity and the AntiChrist Jewish Priesthood
Jewish priesthood, and later, to a greater degree, the Christian, priests survived the Roman persecution and attained power by siding with their decadents. They turned against their natural world. Their resentment against those who were well-constituted, (in charge), led them to invent another world from which life affirmation would appear as the battle between good and evil. In order to survive, the Jewish priests made use of the decadents and their large population at the time.
The Jews were not decadents, themselves. As they have the toughest national will to life which has ever existed on earth. However, they pretended to be decadents so they could lets say, place themselves at the head of all decadence movements, as with the Christianity of Paul, so as to make of them something stronger than any other party that affirms life. Thus survive, as many people of the world today would have done when faced with death.
They became Gods chosen people.
They used five stages to denaturalize the values of life and to set themselves above their petty tyrants.
(1.) Israel’s Yahweh was the expression of their consciousness of power, of their delight in themselves, their hopes for themselves. Because Yahweh was their God, they considered him to be the God of justice. The Jews affirmed themselves, realized their own power, and had a good conscience. Even after internal anarchy and Assyrian invasions weakened Israel, it retained its worship of God as a king who is all soldier, judge and creator.
(2.) Concept of God is falsified. Yahweh became a demanding god of justice who is no longer at one with Israel or an expression of national self-confidence. Can jealousy and love come from the same omniscient being?
(3.) Concept of morality is falsified. Morality is no longer an expression of life and growth. Instead, morality opposes life by presenting well-being as a dangerous temptation. Priestly agitators interpret all good fortune as a reward, all misfortune is punishment for disobedience of God, for sin. Hence, the creation of original sin, which even a newborn is guilty.
(4.) History of Israel is falsified. The great epoch becomes an epoch of decay. The Exile from Egypt becomes an eternal punishment for the great epoch. An epoch in which the priest was as nothing yet. Forty years later, the past was translated into religious terms. Carved into stone. It was a record of guilt, punishment, piety, and reward in relation to their new-found God Yahweh. A moral world order is established which assigns value to actions that obey the will of God (and which claims that his general will, i.e. the right way of life for everyone, is eternal and unchanging). Priests teach that the ruling power of the will of God, is expressed as punishment and reward according to the degree of obedience, demonstrated in the destiny of a nation, of an individual. Which brings into question free will.
(5.) God’s will is revealed in the holy scripture. The sacred book formulates the will of God and specifies what is to be given to the priests. Priests become parasites. I must ask, Why didn’t God write his book in the hearts of man? Deserving of the will of God. All things of life are so ordered that the priest are everywhere and are indispensable at all the natural events of life, birth, marriage, sickness, even death. Not to speak of ‘sacrifice’ (meal times). When the priest sanctifies and bestows all value. Natural values become utterly valueless. Disobedience of God (the priest) is ‘sin.’ Subjection and service to God (the priest) is redemption. Priests use ‘Original Sin’ to gain and hold on to their power of sin.
Let It Go !
Original sin, also called ancestral sin, according to a Christian theological doctrine, humanity’s state of sin resulting from the fall of man stems from Adam’s rebellion in Eden. This condition has been characterized in many ways, ranging from something as insignificant as a slight deficiency, or a tendency toward sin yet without the collective guilt, referred to as “sin nature”. To something as drastic as total depravity or automatic guilt of all humans through collective guilt. The more guilt the better for the priests.
And of course who else to blame but man’s partner and mate.
The concept of original sin was first alluded to in the 2nd century by Irenaeus, Bishop of Lyons in his controversy, which by the way was written in Greek. Its scriptural foundation is based on the New Testament teaching of Paul the Apostle (Romans 5:12-21 and 1 Corinthians 15:22), and Psalm 51:5. Tertullian, Cyprian, Ambrose and Ambrosiaster considered that mankind shares in Adam’s sin, transmitted to each human generation. Why did God Say, Be Fruitful and Multiply?
Original Sin do we share the blame?
Yes we Do!
(Exodus 20:5) – “You shall not worship them or serve them; for I, the Lord your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me.”
No we Don’t!
(Deuteronomy 24:16) – “Fathers shall not be put to death for their sons, nor shall sons be put to death for their fathers; everyone shall be put to death for their own sin.”
It appears that no one can agree. Not even the written words of the bible. The only book in town.
Augustine’s formulation of original sin was popular among Reformers, such names as Martin Luther and John Calvin, who equated original sin with concupiscence, affirming that it persisted even after baptism and this has completely destroyed any freedom. There are nine occurrences of concupiscence in the Douay-Rheims Bible and three occurrences in the King James Bible.
Within Roman Catholicism, the Jansenist movement, which the Church then declared heretical, maintained that original sin destroyed the freedom of will. This doctrine is not found in mainstream Judaism. Although there were some Jewish teachers in Talmudic times who believed that death was a punishment brought upon mankind on account of Adam’s sin, not the dominant view in Judaism today. The concept is not found in Islam either. Depending on how it is defined, original sin is also rejected by some Christian theologies today.
The promise of eternal life
The apostles claimed that Jesus’ death was a sacrifice of an innocent man for the sins of the guilty. Jesus had done away with the concept ‘guilt’ itself? Jesus became judge and jury! After all Jesus had denied any chasm between God and man, he lived this unity of God and man as his ‘glad tidings’, and then die the same way. In order to claim that there is life after death, that man lives forever. Some how the apostles ignored Jesus example of blessed living.
The apostle Paul, made immortality the main point in 1 Corinthians 15:17 when he said, “if Christ be not raised, your faith is vain.” Paul himself even taught personal immortality as a reward. Paul used the promise of life after death as a way to seize tyrannical power over the masses. This changed Christianity from a peace, loving natural movement that achieves real happiness and harmony into a religion whose final judgment offers a possible resurrection and eternal life. The Hook, If one only has the faith.
Paul falsified the history of Christianity, the history of Israel, and the history of mankind by making them all seem to be a preparation for the crucifixion and life ever after. The great lie of personal immortality destroys all rationality, all natural instincts, all that is healthy, normal, all that is life. Promoting, all that guarantees a future arouses mistrust. The meaning of life is that there is no meaning to our present life. One lives our life, for life in the beyond. By offering immortal life to everyone, after death, Christianity appealed to everyone’s ego. Somebody else has done all the suffering for you. The laws of nature would be broken, there’s salvation for everyone. It is to this pitiable flattery of personal vanity that Christianity owes its victory. It is with this falsity that it has persuaded to its side everything, ill constituted, rebellious minded, under privileged, all the scum and refuse of mankind to be saved.
This belief influenced politics and led to revolutions against aristocracies. Paul’s pretense of holiness and his use of priestly concepts were all typically Jewish. Christianity separated itself from Judaism as though it was the chosen religion of all Jews. As if only the word ‘Christian’ was the meaning, the salt, the measure, and the Last Judgment of all the rest. Christianity then divided itself from the world by appropriating the concepts of ‘God,’ ‘truth,’ ‘light,’ ‘spirit,’ ‘love,’ ‘wisdom,’ ‘life’ as if these were synonyms of itself!
In Christianity, as the art of holy lying, the whole of Judaism, attains its greatest perfection. The Christian is only a Jew of a ‘more liberal’ persuasion. Blood is Blood!
Let He who has not sin, cast the first stone. We must remember after all Paul was blind. So who did the writing? The Christian as seen, is a rebel in his lowest instincts against everything privileged. He always lives and struggles for ‘equal rights’, or live and let live. If one wants to be, in one’s own person, ‘chosen of their God’ then every other principle of selection, such as on the basis of integrity, manliness and pride, beauty and liberality of heart, is simply ‘worldly’. And as such evil.
The AntiChrist, Beyond Good and Evil
Philosophers of the past were lacking a critical sense and blindly accepting dogmatic premises in their consideration of morality. Specifically, of the founding of grand metaphysical systems upon which the faith of that of a good man is the opposite of the evil man, and not just a different expression of the same basic impulses that find a more direct expression in the evil man. An approach that fearlessly confronts the perspective nature of knowledge and the perilous condition of the modern individual.
On philosophers, free spirits, and scholars
The philosophers of the past, had a blind dogmatism plagued by moral prejudice masquerading as their search for objective truth.
Let me ask you, What is truth? Why would we want the “truth”? Rather than just recognizing untruth as a condition of truth. The philosophers of the past have an entirely psychological explanation of every philosophy. Whereas, each has been an involuntary and unconscious memoriam or purposeful exchange on the part of its author that exists only to justify their moral prejudices, which they solemnly baptizes as “truths”. Don’t we all?
“Free spirits”, by contrast to the philosophers of the past, are investigators to the point of cruelty, with sticky fingers for the ungraspable, with teeth and stomach for the most things indigestible. For those who would suffer for the sake of their truth, and to those indignant sufferers for truth.
“God is dead”
After Buddha was dead, people showed his shadow for centuries afterwards in a cave, an immense frightful shadow. God is dead. But as the human race is constituted, there will perhaps be caves for millenniums yet, in which people will show this shadow. And we, we have still to overcome his shadow!
Those that have ears let them hear and lend their ears instead to “cynics”, those who “speak ‘badly’ of man , but do not speak ill of him. Hipsters, Kipsters and Finger Poppin Daddies, Knock me your lobes!
There are all kinds of fearless scholars who are truly independent of others prejudices, but these “philosophical labourers and men of science in general should not be confused with philosophers, who are commanders and law-givers.
The Christian God is harmful and a crime against natural life. The God that Paul created is a negation of God. Christianity, in its opposition to itself, is mortally hostile to the wisdom of this world, which includes science. Paul understood the need for the lie, for ‘faith. Did Paul willed to ruin the ‘old wisdom of this world’ and, in Jewish fashion, gave the name of “God” and Torah to his own will. Oh Brother Paul.
In the Old Testament, Genesis 3:5, God’s, and the priests’, offer the hellish anxiety of regarding science has been chronicled since the garden of Eden.
Man tasted knowledge thanks to Eve and there will come an end to priests and the gods if man becomes! Learns to love one another. Priests used the concepts of “sin”, “guilt”, and “punishment” to oppose knowledge, science, and the concepts of cause and effect. Sinful, suffering humans believe in supernatural agents. Such sinners are dependent on their priests for salvation, redemption, and forgiveness. In essence, the priests rule through the invention of sin. And our belief in it. Creates the AntiChrist.
The AntiChrist of Science
Is Science the only truth? Well they would have you believe that Science is the most recent and noblest form of the ascetic ideal.
Science has no faith in itself, we always need more studies, more proof, this acts only as a means of self-anesthetization for the sufferers of science, (the scientists) who do not want to admit that they are such. In its clear opposition to the ascetic ideal, which has succeeded merely in demolishing the ideal’s of Self, sheathing, the play of masks, play an important role, as due big building, though its experimentation and its temporary solidification, lignification, dogmatization, the realization changes from moment to moment. By dismantling the claims to the theological importance of man, has merely come to substitute the self contempt of man, as the ideal science and the only receiver of the knowledge of the creation.
Nature’s seemingly conformity to laws, is merely ones interpretation of the phenomena which natural science simply observes. This same phenomena could equally be interpreted as demonstrating the tyrannically ruthless and inexorable enforcement of power-demands. The Petty Tyrant. Where others take advantage.
When it is we alone who have fabricated these causes, succession, lignification, relativity, compulsion, number, law, freedom, motive, reason and purpose.
When we find out that the world does not have the objective value or meaning that we want it to have or have long since believed it to have, we find ourselves in a crisis. We woke up. With the decline of Christianity and the rise of physiological decadence, nihilism is in fact the characteristic of our modern age. However, the rise of nihilism is still incomplete and it has yet to be overcome.
Metaphysical nihilism is the philosophical theory that there might be no objects at all, unless of course someone objects. i.e. that there is a possible world in which there are no objects at all, or at the very least no solid objects.
This way every possible world has one object, there is at least one that contains you. Which I call Me, Myself, and I. Which after all are only abstract objects or possibly nothing. Free will than becomes a matter of choice.
An extreme form of metaphysical nihilism is commonly defined as the belief that nothing exists as a correspondent component of the self sustainable world. One way of interpreting such a statement would be, It is impossible, I can’t distinguish ‘existence’ from ‘non-existence’ as there are no objective qualities, and thus a reality, that one could possess in order to discern between the two agreed realities.
If one cannot discern existence from nonexistence, then the concept of existence has no meaning. In other words, does not ‘exist’ in any meaningful way. Where in this sense it is used to argue that existence has a higher state of reality, which is arguably a necessary and defining quality, existence itself then means nothing.
It could be argued that this belief, once combined with epistemological nihilism, leaves one with an all-encompassing nihilism in which nothing can be said to be real or true. Therefore have no value and does not exist. A similar position can be found in solipsism. However, in this viewpoint the solipsist affirms, where the nihilist would deny the self. Both these positions are forms of anti-realism.
The interpretation of existence must be based on resolution. The resolution with which humans can see and perceive improper parts as well as the proper parts of this world. This is not an objective fact, but a case of reality, rather an implicit trait that can only be qualitatively explored, experienced and expressed. Therefore there is no arguable way to surmise or measure the validity of Truth! Because nothing exists.
Example, An ant can get lost on a large cylindrical object because the circumference of the object is so large in respect to the ant that the ant effectively feels as though the cable has no curvature. Thus, the resolution with which the ant views the world, is very important in determining the factor in how the ant experiences its world of feeling. We humans once believed the world was flat as well and now we think/believe we know better. Need a bigger world? Talk to an Ant.
Moral nihilism, also known as ethical nihilism, is the meta-ethical view that morality does not exist as something inherent to objective reality. Therefore no action is necessarily preferable to any other. For example, a moral nihilist would say that killing someone, for whatever reason, is not inherently right or wrong. In simple terms, the lack of a moral system. Other nihilists may argue not that there is no morality at all, but if it does exist, it is a human construct and thus artificial, wherein any and all meaning is relative for different possible outcomes. Just a point of view.
In the example, if someone kills someone else, a nihilist might argue that killing is not inherently a bad thing, or bad independently from our moral beliefs, because of the way morality is constructed as some rudimentary dichotomy. What is said to be a bad thing is simply given a higher negative weighting than what is called good. As a result, killing the individual was bad only because it did not let the individual live, which in turn was arbitrarily given a positive weighting. In this way a moral nihilist believes that all moral claims are false.
An alternative scholarly perspective is that moral nihilism is a type of morality in itself. Whereas, in the widest sense of the word ‘morality’, moral nihilism is a morality.
The AntiChrist of morality and the Christian Religion
In the pre-moral period of mankind’s awakening, actions were judged by their consequences. Over the past 10,000 years, however, a morality has developed where actions are judged by their origins, (motivations), not their consequences. This morality of intentions is a prejudice and something provisional that must be overcome. We judge by the morality of intention, and how can one ever know the intentions of another. Expect through the results of their actions. This than makes morality a judgement after the fact. Whereas a non-egoistical morality demands that Moralities must first be forced to bow before a command hierarchy a group of people dedicated to carry out orders. This hierarchy is usually the most vulnerable and yet the most powerful. Every high culture begins by recognizing the rhetoric of persuasion, one in which one is awaken emotionally, so as to induce them to make the judgment desired.
The Antichrist to the Christian Religion
Is the Christian religion and its morality based on the imaginary of fictions/make-believe ? Does this entire fictional world have its roots in the hatred of the natural world? The reason I ask is that most of us only become spiritual only in the face of death. The Christian God reflects Christianity’s decadence. If Christians were naturally strong and confident, they would have a God who is constructive. A God who counsels, loves, supports, as well as a friend, instead of a God of a people who feel themselves as perishing and without hope. Weak, decadent, and sick people, whose will to have power, will give themselves to a God who is purely good.
They will then attribute evil and deviltry to their masters “God”. Modern Metaphysicians have eliminated the attributes, such as strength, bravery, and pride, Spirit, Self, from the concept of God. As a result, it has deteriorated into an insubstantial ideal, a construct of, Absolute, a thing in itself of its self.
The Christian concept of God becomes degenerated into a contradiction of life, instead of being life’s transfiguration and the eternal ‘Yes‘! The Christian God is a declaration of war against life, against nature, against the will to live! You know, Love no other God before me!
Religion has always been connected to “three dangerous dietary prescriptions: solitude, fasting and sexual abstinence”, and has exerted its cruelty through demanding sacrifice according to a ladder with different rungs of cruelty and sacrifice, which has ultimately caused God Himself to become sacrificed. Any God that would ask you to kill your son. Is not a God!
This trinity appears throughout Christianity as in the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit/Ghost. The same is true of the of Gods opponent in Christianity were there is Satan, Lucifer, and the Devil all mistakenly called the same being.
Christianity, is the most fatal kind of self presumption ever, as it has beaten everything joyful, assertive and natural out of man and turned him into a sublime abortion of God-fearing, self-serving individuals only out for their own salvation.
How the “True World” Became a Fiction
Philosophers have fictionalized the apparent world, casting the product of the senses into doubt, and thereby removing the concept of the real world. Leaving us with only five senses in which to conceptualize the entire universe. This Idea is divided into six parts:
The wise and pious man dwells in the real world, which he attains through his wisdom, skills in perception and dreams, which warrants a more accurate view of the real world.
The wise and pious man doesn’t dwell in the real world, but rather it is promised to him, a goal to live for. At lease to the sinner who repents.
The real world is unattainable and cannot be promised, yet it remains a consolation when confronted with our perceived injustices of this apparent world.
If the real world is not attained, then is it unknown?
Therefore, there is no duty to the unknown real world, and thus no consolation derived from it.
The idea of a real world has become useless as it provides no consolation or motive for life. It is therefore cast aside as a useless abstraction.
What world is then left? The concept of the real world has been abolished, and with it, the idea of an apparent heavenly world to follow.
The Holy Lie and AntiChrist belief
Lying, or not wanting to see as one sees, is a trait of those who are devoted to a party or faction needing to continue the lie or make-believe. Lying is utilized by all priests, whether pagan, Jewish, Christian, or Alien. The right to lie and the shrewdness of the holy revelation pertains only to the priestly type. Whereas The ‘Law,’ the ‘will of God,’ the ‘sacred book,’ and the ‘inspiration’ are all merely words for the conditions under which the priest comes to power, and by which they maintain their power.
Christianity’s lies are not holy ones at all. They serve only the priest to the bad ends of the believer with the poisoning, slandering, denying of life and its simple pleasures, contempt for the body, Nature, the denigration and self violation of the consciousness of man through the concept of sin. Let me ask, If there was no sin would there be a need for the Christian God?
The purpose of the Christian Holy Lie is bad because it is born of weakness, of envy, of revenge with a need and dependence on someone else for ones own redemption. Christianity lied about sin, guilt, punishment, and immortality in order to destroy Imperial Rome which was their petty tyrant at the time. An organization that was designed to promote life. Paul realized that with the symbol of a dying God on the Cross one could sum up everything down trodden, everything in a secret revolt, the entire heritage of the antichrist agitation in the Roman empire, into a tremendous power. His vision on the road to Damascus was that to deprive the world of the value it needed, the belief in immortality, that the concept of ‘Hell’ will even master Rome. Bring them to their knees, before Lions. And that with the belief in the beyond one kills the present life. Isn’t revenge sweet?
Belief in something is a sign of decadence, of a broken will to live in the now. The Christian proof of strength is that belief makes blessed. This maybe true, thus it is true for the Christian. But blessedness is something that the priest promises for the future, something promised for a life in service God. It, the promise, is also an object of belief. Also, blessedness, or pleasure, cannot be a proof of truth. Where on earth is it established that true judgments of the heart, give more enjoyment than false ones? It could be said, that belief makes blessed, thus it is lies. It’s also been said that Ignorance is Bliss another lie.
The AntiChrist Way of the World
The valuations of good/evil or good/bad have distinct origins and that the two senses of good reflect, in their origins, that they have radically opposed meanings. Aren’t they just words? The noble mode of valuation calls itself, good and believes it stands for, everything which is powerful and life-asserting. In the “good/evil” distinction, which is the product of a “slave morality”, so-called evil equates to what aristocratic morality calls good. This valuation develops out of the resentment of the weak in the face of the powerful, by whom they are oppressed and whom they envy.
Slave morality in feeling resentment does not seek redress for its grievances by taking revenge through action, as the noble would, but by setting up an imaginary revenge. It therefore needs enemies in order to sustain itself, unlike noble morality, which hardly takes enemies seriously and forgets about them instantly having dealt with them. The weak deceive themselves into thinking that the meek are blessed and will win everlasting life, thereby ultimately vanquishing the strong. They invent the term evil to apply to the strong, and that which proceeds from strength, which is precisely what is good, according to the noble, aristocratic valuation. These latter call their inferiors bad in the sense of worthless eaters and ill-born, but not evil, just useless. Rather such a value judgment gains currency by being increasingly burned into the human consciousness. The judgment of good, therefore, originates not with the beneficiaries of altruistic actions. But rather, the good themselves (the powerful) coined the term good.
Is it a mistake to hold beasts of prey to be evil, for their actions that stem from their inherent strength, rather than any malicious intent. One should not blame them for their hunger of their enemies, or their resistances and triumphs. Similarly, it is also a mistake to resent the strong for their actions. Only the weak need the illusion of the subject (soul) to hold their actions together as a unity. When they have no right to make the bird of prey accountable for being a bird of prey.
The origin of the institution of punishment is in a straightforward (pre-moral) creditor/debtor relationship. God giveth, God taketh away. Man relies on the apparatus of forgetfulness which has been bred into him. This forgetfulness is an active “faculty of repression”, not a mere inertia or absent-mindedness. Stand up and fight or lay down and become prey.
So where is the Christian god in all of this?
For the genesis of the concept god one must consider what happens when a tribe becomes ever more powerful. In a tribe mentality, the current generation always pays homage to its ancestors, offering sacrifices to them as a demonstration of gratitude. As the power of the tribe grows, the need to offer thanks to the ancestors does not decline, but rather increases as it has ever more reason to pay homage to the ancestors and to fear them. At the maximum range of fear, the ancestor is than transfigured into a god. Which than becomes a positive suggestion for a counter movement.
Christians often confuse the effect for the cause, and that they project their human ego and subjectivity on to other things, thereby creating an illusionary concept of being. Thus, God.
When in reality, a motive or intention is an accompaniment to an act. Rather than the cause of that act. By removing causal agency based on free, or conscious will, everything is necessary in a whole that can neither be judged nor condemned, because there is nothing outside of it, (Christianity). Therefore, What people typically deem as a vice is in fact merely the inability not to react to a stimulus. In this light, the concept of morality becomes purely a means of control, this means the doctrine of will has been invented essentially for the purpose of punishment, that is of finding one guilty of sin.
One must not equate the origin of a thing to its utility. The origin of punishment, for example, is in a procedure that predates punishment. Punishment has not just one purpose, but a whole range of meanings which finally crystallizes into a kind of unity that is difficult to dissolve, difficult to analyze, and completely and utterly undefinable. The process by which the succession of different meanings is imposed and is driven by the willingness to power, the basic instinct for domination underlying all human interaction. There are many different uses for punishment, regardless of its uses. Punishment rarely opens one up to the process or the awakening of remorse. The psychology of prisoners shows that punishment makes them hard and cold as it concentrates, it also sharpens the feeling of alienation. As God punishes, he also alienates.
Men were thought of as free so that they could become guilty. Consequently, every action had to be thought of as willed, the origin of every action as lying in the consciousness of man today, where we have started to move in the reverse direction, Away from God when we immoralists especially are trying with all our might to remove the concept of guilt and the concept of punishment from the world and to purge psychology, history, nature, the social institutions and sanctions of them, there is in my eyes no more radical opposition than that of the theologians, who continue to infect the innocence with punishment and guilt by means of the concept of a moral and all-powerful God. Christianity is a hangman’s metaphysics. With only three nails. Y? At this point I’m still not sure. Could be, that’s all they had. Maybe you have an insight to share.
The AntiChrist of Christ
In the gospels, the ministry of Jesus all starts with his Baptism by John the Baptist, when he is about thirty years old. Jesus then begins preaching in Galilee and gathers his twelve disciples which including him makes thirteen. Is this an unlucky number? After the proclamation of Jesus as Christ, three of the disciples witness his Transfiguration. After the death of John the Baptist and the Transfiguration, Jesus starts his final journey to Jerusalem, having predicted his own death. Jesus makes a triumphal entry into Jerusalem, on the back of an ass Donkey, and once their friction with the Pharisees increases and one of his disciples agrees to betray him for thirty pieces of silver. The Act is complete. Which some believe was the plan.
In the gospel accounts, towards the end of the final week in Jerusalem, Jesus has the Last Supper with his disciples, and the next day is betrayed, arrested and tried. The trial ends in his crucifixion and death. Three days after his burial, he is resurrected and appears to his disciples over a 40 day period, after which he ascends to Heaven, and the Christians are awaiting his return. In the past there have been a number of Gods that have promised to return. Just ask a Mayan or Aztec.
In the final week of Christs life it begins with his entry into Jerusalem, it concludes with his crucifixion and burial on that Friday. Spent three days in hell and arose on Easter Sunday. Due the Math.
The AntiChrist Redeemer type
The Christian considers Jesus as their hero, genius and savior. The Non Christian might consider him an Idiot. With an antipathy toward the material world, Jesus was at home in the world undisturbed by reality of any kind, a merely ‘inner’ world, a ‘real’ world, an ‘eternal’ world. Where the Kingdom of God is within. The redeemer type is determined by a morbid intolerance of pain. Extreme sensitivity results in avoidance of the world. Also, any feeling of resistance to the world is experienced as pain. Even evil is therefore not resisted. The fear of pain, even of the infinitely small in pain, cannot end otherwise than in a religion of love.
Jesus was a distorted version of the redeemer type. The first disciples, in their Gospels, described him as having Old Testament characteristics such as prophet, Messiah, miracle worker, moral preacher, teacher, etc. According to Jesus, the kingdom of heaven belongs to ‘children’. Everyone has an equal right to become a child of God (Sheeple). His spirituality is infantile, a result of delayed puberty. Jesus does not resist or contend with the world because he doesn’t recognize the importance of this world. His life is its own kingdom of God at every moment. Early Christians used Semitic concepts to express his teaching, but his anti-realism could just as easily have been a characteristic of Taoism or Hinduism.
The Christian is known by his acts. He offers no resistance to evil, He has no anger and wants no revenge. Blessedness is not promised on conditions, as in Judaism. The Gospel’s glad tidings are that there is no distinction between God and man. There is no Judaic concern for sin, prayers, rituals, forgiveness, repentance, guilt, punishment, or faith. This Evangelic practice alone leads to God, Hell, it is God! It is only in the practice of life that one feels ‘divine,’ ‘blessed,’ ‘evangelical,’ at all times a child of God.
There were two worlds for the teacher of the Gospel’s glad tidings. The real, true world is an inner experience of the heart in which all things are blessedly transfigured, internalized, and perfected. And the apparent world, which is only a collection of psychological symbols, signs, and metaphors. These symbols are expressed in terms of space, time, history, nature and science.
Examples of these were mere symbols and the concepts of “God as a person”, “the son of man”, “the hour of death”, and “the kingdom of heaven”. Jesus did not want to redeem anyone. He wanted to show everyone how to live. His legacy was his bearing and behavior, a consciousness. He did not resist evildoers. He loved evildoers.
This Doowan contends that the Antichrist is not a disbelief in the Son of GOD, But in the disbelief of the value of each individual spirit. And the lack of knowledge about humanities collective consciousness. Ah, Who Cares?