MONKEY MAN

Monkey Man an Evolutionary process of the Spirit of Humanity

Missing Link
I can’t say. I can’t see, What, I can’t hear you. Monkey Man

Will You Take the Red Pill or the Blue Pill?

Red or Blue it is ALL up to you!
Red or Blue it is ALL up to you!

For the Red Pill and its opposite, the Blue Pill, are popular culture symbols representing the choice between embracing the sometimes painful (Red Pill) truth of Monkey Man reality which of itself is not a negative or positive thing. All material beings are formed from a mold, which molds their form. Thus we may simply have a Monkey Man Primate connection in our body form, where others may have an Insect connection, or Reptile connection, etc..

Where for the (Blue Pill) blissful ignorance of the illusion of Humanity being the only material sentient being made in the image of their God. For all sentient beings are made in the image of the creator. For it may be the case that man, (Humanity) has created God in their image. Therefore living in an illusion of separation from all other forms of life.

“You take the blue pill, the story ends. You wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill, you stay in Wonderland, and I show you how deep the rabbit hole goes.”

Jackrabbit
What’s up Doc?

The Blue Pill

Sow you have taken the Blue Pill, Great choice! For taking of the Blue Pill, you have found your bliss in the ignorance of the illusion you wish to believe. Therefore there is no reason to fill ones mind with useless information that will only sever to confuse and upset. Don’t worry be happy in your illusion! Go on with your day-to-day existence reflecting the illusion of your beliefs. No harm no foul. There are more important things in life than to know. It’s been said; You can lead a Horse to water, however, you can’t make it drink. “Ignorance is bliss.” Thus it serves no purpose to offer an other a perspective of some thing different. Have a nice day!

Tombstone
Through Death. Life is experienced. Not to Experience life is death anyway. What’s the big Deal?

“Everything is and isn’t, at the same time”, “all truths are but half−truths”, “every truth is half−false”

The Red Pill

Sow you have taken the Red Pill, Great choice! For taking of the Red Pill you have found your Wonderland. For in Wonderland there is only Wonder. Shall we go inside to see what’s there?

“While All is THE ALL, it is equally true that THE ALL is in All.

Monkey Man

Scientists have found have many fossils of ancient hominids Monkey Man throughout time. They have discovered and named up to 18 types of hominids.

The earliest hominids had small teeth, flat faces, large brains and the ability to walk upright. All these characteristics resembled human like features. The oldest fossils of Monkey Man hominids were located in Africa that were 6-7 million years old, so scientist think the evolution of the human race started in Africa.

The Cradle of Mankind
The Cradle of Mankind Monkey Man

Which a number of ancient texts conquer. It is believed that E-den was located in Africa, near the ancient Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Where scientists have found the remains of Monkey Man listed below.

Monkey Man, Homo ergaster (meaning “working man”) or African Homo erectus is an extinct chronospecies of the genus Homo that lived in eastern and southern Africa during the early Pleistocene, that is, between 1.9 million and 1.4 million years ago. It is one of the earliest hominids, which are those hominids that comprise the original members and species of the human clade after splitting from the line of the chimpanzees. (Homo ergaster is variously thought to be ancestral to, or as sharing a common ancestor with, or as being the same species as, Homo erectus).

Daniel Schaan image of Homo Ergaster
Working Man or something to work with. Daniel Schaan image of Homo Ergaster

Interpreting Homo ergaster inevitably leads to Homo erectus, particularly regarding the taxonomy issues that persist within the scientific community of classifying the two species and separating their two lineages—if indeed they represent two separate lineages rather than one. Some palaeoanthropologists consider H. ergaster to be a variety of H. erectus, that is, the so-called African Homo erectus. Others call H. ergaster the direct ancestor of H. erectus, which then emigrated out of Africa into Eurasia and branched into a distinct species. Still others dispense with the specific epithet ergaster and make no such distinctions among fossils assigned to erectus.

The latest discoveries at Dmanisi, Georgia, suggest that all the contemporary groups of early Homo in Africa, including Homo ergaster, are of the same species and should be assigned to Homo erectus.

The binomial name was published in 1975 by Groves and Mazák. The specific epithet, “ergaster”, is derived from the Ancient Greek ἐργαστήρ “workman”, in reference to the advanced lithic technology developed by the species, thereby introducing the Acheulean industry.

Monkey Man, Homo erectus (meaning “upright man”, from the Latin ērigere, “to put up, set upright”) is an extinct species of hominid that lived throughout most of the Pleistocene geological epoch. Its earliest fossil evidence dates to 1.9 million years ago and the most recent to 70,000 years ago. It is generally thought that H. erectus originated in Africa and spread from there, migrating throughout Eurasia as far as Georgia, India, Sri Lanka, China and Indonesia. However other scientists postulate that the species rose first, or separately, in Asia. Debate also continues about the classification, ancestry, and progeny of Homo erectus, especially vis-à-vis Homo ergaster, with two major positions: 1) H. erectus is the same species as H. ergaster, and thereby H. erectus is a direct ancestor of the later hominins including Homo heidelbergensis, Homo neanderthalensis, and Homo sapiens; or, 2) it is in fact an Asian species distinct from African H. ergaster.

There is also another view—an alternative to 1): some palaeo-anthropologists consider H. ergaster to be a variety, that is, the “African” variety, of H. erectus, and they offer the labels “Homo erectus sensu stricto” (strict sense) for the Asian species and “Homo erectus sensu lato” (broad sense) for the greater species comprising both Asian and African populations.

Portrait of a Homo erectus male. Source: BigStockPhoto
To set up right, Portrait of a Homo erectus male. Source: BigStockPhoto

A new debate appeared in 2013, with the documentation of the Dmanisi skulls. Considering the large morphological variation among all Dmanisi skulls, researchers now suggest that several early human ancestors variously classified, for example, as Homo ergaster, or Homo rudolfensis, and perhaps even Homo habilis, should instead be designated as Homo erectus.

It appears that scientist can’t agree on anything, except to debate. Their points of view has been sow narrowed by formal education that they have failed to connect the dots that history and ancient texts provide. They have never stopped to consider that someone or something may have had a hand in the evolution of Monkey Man. However, language provides some clues. Speak out loud this word, “erectus”. One may get the idea.

The Metamorphosis of Monkey Man
The Metamorphosis of Monkey Man

homo- noun Word Origin

1. a combining form appearing in loanwords from Greek, where it meant “same” ( homology); on this model, used in the formation of compound words ( homomorphic). Also, especially before a vowel, hom-.

Origin of homo-Greek, combining form of homós one and the same; akin to Sanskrit sama-; Dictionary.com Unabridged.

Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2016.
British Dictionary definitions for homo-

homo-combining form

1. being the same or like: homologous, homosexual Compare hetero-
Word Origin via Vulgar Latin from Greek, from homos same
Collins English Dictionary – Complete & Unabridged 2012 Digital Edition

Word Origin and History for homo-

Word-forming element meaning “same, the same, equal, like,” before vowels hom-, from Greek homos “one and the same,” also “belonging to two or more jointly,” from PIE *somos (cf. Sanskrit samah “even, the same,” Lithuanian similis “like,” Gothic sama “the same,” samana “together;” see same ).
word-forming element meaning “homosexual,” abstracted since early 20c. from homosexual, and ultimately identical to homo- (1).
Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2010 Douglas Harper

Take the Red pill
Here take two of these and call me in the morning. If your still alive!

homo- in Medicine homo- or hom- pref. Same; like: homotype.

The American Heritage® Stedman’s Medical Dictionary

homo- in Science

homo- A prefix meaning “same,” as in homogamous, having the same kind of flower. Before vowels hom-, word-forming element meaning “same, the same, equal, like” (opposed to hetero-), from Greek homos “one and the same,” also “belonging to two or more jointly,” from PIE *somo-, from root *sem- (1) “as one; together with” (see same).

Did you catch that? … Greek… A combining form, being the same as, belonging to two or more jointly. I ask you? Combining with what? Being the same as what? Belonging to which two or more jointly?

Could this be why the bible said… Let us create man?

We were told above to See “Same”! Lets SEE it shall we?

The Eye of Creation looks upon us
The Eye of Creation looks upon us

Same [seym] Synonyms, adjective

Word Origin

Note: The superfluous meanings of “same” are not listed to save space and reading. Going directly to the Synonym. One can always look up “same”.

Synonyms

1–3. corresponding, interchangeable, equal. Same, similar agree in indicating a correspondence between two or more things. Same means alike in kind, degree, quality; that is, identical (with): to eat the same food every day; at the same price. Similar means like, resembling, having certain qualities in common, somewhat the same as, of nearly the same kind as: similar in appearance; Don’t treat them as if they were the same when they are only similar.

hetero- Look up hetero- at Dictionary.com

Before vowels heter-, word-forming element meaning “other, different,” from Greek heteros “the other (of two), another, different; second; other than usual.” It is a compound; the first element means “one, at one, together,” from PIE *sem- (1) “one” (see same); the second is cognate with the second element in Latin al-ter, Gothic an-þar, Old English o-ðer “other.”

Compounds in classical Greek show the range of the word there: Heterokretes “true Cretan,” (that is, of the old stock); heteroglossos “of foreign language;” heterozelos “zealous for one side;” heterotropos “of a different sort or fashion,” literally “turning the other way;” heterophron “raving,” literally “of other mind.” “true Cretan”, from Greek ἐτεός, meaning “true” + Cretan) is the non-Greek language of a few alphabetic inscriptions of ancient Crete.

Somebody called us Homo, Hetero is equally valid. Who’s calling us names? Well let me ask you. Who’s doing the Homo stuff around here? Shall we dispense with the name calling?

Homo sapiens (n.) Look up Homo sapiens at Dictionary.com

The genus of human beings, 1802, in William Turton’s translation of Linnæus, coined in Modern Latin from Latin homo “man” (technically “male human,” but in logical and scholastic writing “human being;” see homunculus) + sapiens, present participle of sapere “be wise” (see sapient).

Zombies Texting
Homo Sapiens, “Be wise”, Look how wise they look. No Way, they don’t look like Monkey Man

Homunculus (n.) Look up homunculus at Dictionary.com

“Tiny human being produced artificially,” 1650s, from Latin homunculus (plural homunculi), literally “little person,” with -culus, diminutive suffix, + homo (genitive hominis), which technically meant “male human,” but it also was used with a sense “the human race, mankind;” while in Vulgar Latin it could be used as “one, anyone, they, people” and in logical and scholastic writing as “a human being, person.” This is conjectured to be perhaps from PIE *(dh)ghomon-, literally “earthling,” from *dhghem- “earth” (see chthonic; also compare human). Other Latin diminutives from homo included homullus, homuncio.

Sapient (adj.) Look up sapient at Dictionary.com

“Wise,” late 15c. (early 15c. as a surname), from Old French sapient, from Latin sapientem (nominative sapiens), present participle of sapere “to taste, have taste, be wise,” from PIE root *sep- (1) “to taste, perceive” (cognates: Old Saxon an-sebban “to perceive, remark,” Old High German antseffen, Old English sefa “mind, understanding, insight”).

Many traits unique to humans were thought to have originated in the genus Homo between 2.4 and 1.8 million years ago in Africa. Although scientists have recognized these characteristics for decades, they are reconsidering the true evolutionary factors that drove them.

A large brain, long legs, the ability to craft tools and prolonged maturation periods were all thought to have evolved together at the start of the Homo lineage as African grasslands expanded and Earth’s climate became cooler and drier.

However, new climate and fossil evidence analyzed by a team of researchers, including Smithsonian paleoanthropologist Richard Potts, Susan Antón, professor of anthropology at New York University, and Leslie Aiello, president of the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, suggests that these traits did not arise as a single package. Rather, several key ingredients once thought to define Homo evolved in earlier Australopithecus ancestors between 3 and 4 million years ago, while others emerged significantly later.

Consciousness comes from our energy body How cares about the Meat stick?
Consciousness comes from our energy body. Who cares about the Meat stick?

The team’s research takes an innovative approach to integrating paleoclimate data, new fossils and understandings of the genus Homo, archaeological remains and biological studies of a wide range of mammals (including humans). The synthesis of these data led the team to conclude that the ability of early humans to adjust to changing conditions ultimately enabled the earliest species of Homo to vary, survive and begin spreading from Africa to Eurasia 1.85 million years ago. Additional information about this study is available in the July 4 issue of Science.

Potts developed a new climate framework for East African human evolution that depicts most of the era from 2.5 million to 1.5 million years ago as a time of strong climate instability and shifting intensity of annual wet and dry seasons. This framework, which is based on Earth’s astronomical cycles, provides the basis for some of the paper’s key findings, and it suggests that multiple coexisting species of Homo that overlapped geographically emerged in highly changing environments.

Homo habilis, ( Latin: “able man” or “handy man”) Homo habilis Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. extinct species of human, the most ancient representative of the human genus, Homo. Homo habilis inhabited parts of sub-Saharan Africa from roughly 2.4 million years ago to 1.5 million years ago (mya). In 1959 and 1960 the first fossils were discovered at Olduvai Gorge in northern Tanzania. This discovery was a turning point in the science of paleoanthropology because the oldest previously known human fossils were Asian specimens of Homo erectus. Many features of H. habilis appear to be intermediate in terms of evolutionary development between the relatively primitive Australopithecus and the more-advanced Homo species.

Homo_habilis
Handy man, Could it be that they were Handy thus used

Australopithecus africanus, is an extinct (fossil) species of the australopithecines, the first of an early ape-form species to be classified as hominin (in 1924). Recently it was dated as living between 3.8 to 2.0 million years ago, or in the late Pliocene and early Pleistocene times; it is debated as being a direct ancestor of modern humans. A. africanus was of slender, or gracile, build and has been found only in southern Africa at four sites: Taung (1924), Sterkfontein (1935), Makapansgat (1948) and Gladysvale (1992).

A. africanus was similar in many traits to A. afarensis, a bipedal hominin with arms slightly longer than the legs (a physical trait also found in chimpanzees). It has slightly human-like, advanced cranial features (seen in the crania of Mrs. Ples and STS 71), but also presents primitive features including ape-like curved fingers adapted to tree climbing.

Instead of it being a direct ancestor of later hominins and thereby of humans, some researchers believe that A. africanus evolved into Paranthropus, and specifically that P. robustus descended from A. africanus. Both P. robustus and A. africanus crania seem very alike despite the more heavily built (robust) features of P. robustus, which, like those of the modern gorilla, are adaptations for heavy chewing. A. africanus, on the other hand, had a cranium which quite closely resembled that of a modern chimpanzee; yet both brains measure about 400 cc to 500 cc and probably presented an ape-like intelligence.

Monkey Man
A. africanus Hairy Barbarians as Thoth describes them

Sow as one can SEE, now even the scientists are reconsidering their point of view.

One point that needs to be viewed, is that Monkey Man may have been manipulated not once, not twice, not three times, but is continually being manipulated through eons of time. Not sure if Man-iplated is the right word. However it is true that man is manipulating man as we speak. Evolved maybe a more appropriate term. However, this leads to the question evolved by whom?

Thus a new Monkey Man may just be over the horizon.

Earth
We are light shinning in Creation

Origins of Mankind

Origins of Man research papers profile the beginning of mankind through DNA testing and other scientific methods.

Before we start, it is important to consider that there are 250 gene pairs of the 25,000 in the human genome that are not related to any other terrestrial beings tested thus far. Simply put, no evolutionary bases. Where did these genes come from? How did these genes get into the human genome?

Blood is Blood
Hey, was it you Guys?

What this means is that these 250 genes are NOT shared with any other terrestrial life form.

Nature doesn't due this
Nature doesn’t due this. How is this possible?

Not to mention, chromosome 22 appears to have been fused together. Several investigators in the early 1980s showed that the Philadelphia chromosome trans-location led to the formation of a new BCR/ABL1 fusion gene, composed of the 3’part of the ABL1 gene in the break-point on chromosome 9 and the 5′ part of a gene called BCR in the break-point in chromosome 22.

All Life is Sacred
Reptilian Man, Or was it you Guys?

What did this? Nature, GOD, Extraterrestrials? It’s very interesting that no other evidence is found of chromosomes fussing in nature. Well, I couldn’t find any, maybe you can.

DNA

A new report in the National Academy of Sciences suggests that the common value of >98% similarity of DNA between chimp and humans is incorrect. Roy Britten, author of the study, puts the figure at about 95% when insertions and deletions are included. Importantly, there is much more to these studies than people realize.

The >98.5% similarity has been misleading because it depends on what is being compared. There are a number of significant differences that are difficult to quantify. A review by Gagneux and Varki4 described a list of genetic differences between humans and the great apes. The differences include ‘cytogenetic differences, differences in the type and number of repetitive genomic DNA and transposable elements, abundance and distribution of endogenous retroviruses, the presence and extent of allelic polymorphisms, specific gene inactivation events, gene sequence differences, gene duplications, single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene expression differences, and messenger RNA splicing variations.’

DNA helix
DNA the stuff we are made off.

Specific examples of these differences include:

Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes while chimpanzees have 24. Evolutionary scientists believe that one of the human chromosomes has been formed through the fusion of two small chromosomes in the chimp instead of an intrinsic difference resulting from a separate creation.

At the end of each chromosome is a string of repeating DNA sequences called a telomere. Chimpanzees and other apes have about 23 kilobases (a kilobase is 1,000 base pairs of DNA) of repeats. Humans are unique among primates with much shorter telomeres only 10 kilobases long.

While 18 pairs of chromosomes are ‘virtually identical’, chromosomes 4, 9 and 12 show evidence of being ‘remodeled.’ In other words, the genes and markers on these chromosomes are not in the same order in the human and chimpanzee. Instead of ‘being remodeled’ as the evolutionists suggest, these could, logically, also be intrinsic differences because of a separate creation.

Changing Human Form Chromosome2 in Humans was fused
Changing Human Form
Chromosome 22 in Humans was fused

The Y chromosome in particular is of a different size and has many markers that do not line up between the human and chimpanzee.

Scientists have prepared a human-chimpanzee comparative clone map of chromosome 21 in particular, which cause Down Syndrome. They observed ‘large, non-random regions of difference between the two genomes.’ They found a number of regions that ‘might correspond to insertions that are specific to the human lineage.’

These types of differences are not generally included in calculations of percent DNA similarity. While previous studies have focused on base substitutions, they have missed perhaps the greatest contribution to the genetic differences between chimps and humans. Missing nucleotides from one or the other appear to account for more than twice the number of substituted nucleotides. Although the number of substitutions is about ten times higher than the number of indels, the number of nucleotides involved in indels is greater. These indels were reported to be equally represented in the chimp and human sequences. Therefore, the insertions or deletions were not occurring only in the chimp or only in the human and could also be interpreted as intrinsic differences.

The Recapitulation
The Questions Dreams are made of

Will evolution be called into question now that the similarity of chimpanzee and human DNA has been reduced from >98.5% to ~95%? Probably not, remember the Blue Pill. Regardless of whether the similarity was reduced even below 90%, evolutionists would still believe that humans and apes shared a common ancestor. Just say no to drugs!

Moreover, using percentages hides an important fact. If 5% of the DNA is different, this amounts to 150,000,000 DNA base pairs that are different between them!

The above examples demonstrate that the conclusions of scientific investigations can be different depending on how the study is done. Humans and chimps can have 95% or >98.5% similar DNA depending on which nucleotides are counted and which are excluded. Modern humans can have a single recent ancestor <10,000 or 100,000–200,000 years ago depending on whether a relationship with chimpanzees is assumed and which types of mutations are considered.

The debate over the origins of man continues to rage on the scientific front. With new genetic tools and DNA mapping, much can be surmised from anthropological evidence on the history and origin of man. According to a recent article in Scientific American, The Modern Human Origins Morass, there are essentially two scientific theories for the origin of man): 1 the Neanderthal theory) and 2 the Out of Africa replacement theory.

What? You mean to tell me that science can only work with two theories at a time? Sounds like an either or scenario.

The Monkey Man Neanderthal theory asserts that modern man came from Africa about two million years ago and evolved to Homo sapiens along a single species. The Out of Africa theory asserts that Homo sapiens replaced the Neanderthals and other species approximately 15,000 to 200,000 years ago and formed a new species altogether. However, recent DNA information has brought to light new theories and cast shadows of doubt on the old theories.

The article in Scientific American reports that Svante Pääbo of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, and his colleagues discovered that Neanderthal DNA did not show any relation to DNA from Monkey Man Europeans who supposedly modern man was supposed to have evolved from, according to the Neanderthal theory. In fact, the article reports that modern DNA was more than three times removed from DNA that is compared between two Modern day humans.

DNA testing has proven problematic, according to the Scientific American article. For example, the history of a single gene cannot reflect the entire genetic make-up in an individual; this would involve recovering nuclear DNA which is difficult with today’s technology.

What is clear through DNA testing is that ancient Monkey Man humans shared genes and behavior across the globe, Homo sapiens clearly do not come from one specific group. Essentially, humans have a history of interbreeding that has shaped our behavior and genetic make-up. Therefore, the debate over the origin of man will not end with the methods of DNA testing that modern day man has established, rather, the future will determine whether we solve the mystery the origins of the human race.

Changing Human Form 12 Stranded DNA
Changing Human Form
12 Stranded DNA

There are two main approaches scientists have taken on human biological variation in the past. The first is racial classification, and the second focuses on understanding specific differences. The study of racial classification has been rejected and scientists are currently approaching an explanation using the second method. Some biologists use race to refer to breeds, like in dogs and roses. The human population has not been isolated from each other enough, to develop races. Humans vary biologically in genetic attributes but there are no sharp breaks in humans that we associate with a subspecies.

Racial classification fell out of biological favor for many reasons. Though it is mainly because scientists have trouble grouping people into distinct racial units. A race is supposed to reflect shared genetic material. However, early scholars used phenotypical traits for racial classification. There are many problems to this approach.

The first being, which traits do we use for racial classification, height, weight, body shape, skull form, skin color? Genetic variations were not used in early racial classifications. There are many problems with the methods used to separate races. The biggest being, if we are going to determine race using phenotypical traits, why skin color? Why not other features easily separated within individuals? While we name races by skin color, we do not even name them well.

How many truly white, red, yellow or black people have you actually seen?

We have not always had race. The ancient world, for example, had no conception of it. The first systematic racial classification was that advanced by Johan Freidrich Bloomenbach in 1775. He argued that there were five basic racial divisions… Caucasian Mongolian, Ethiopian, American, and Malay.

Racism as we know it had its origins in early 17th and 18th century European thought. Race was a classification system invented by Europeans which served to press primarily political aims or claims of groups within European countries then to represent the relationships between these groups, rather, between these countries and finally to govern the relations outside Europe. Europe was composed of peoples who had come from different regions and frequently the lines of political tensions coincided to those origins so that evidence about different customs of the original groups could be used in political argument.

New Terrorist Group?
Corporate Racism

The term “race” is used to describe so much in terms of biology, behavior, culture, and social structure that it often seems useless in its ubiquity. Explaining what race is not before delving into a political definition of race reduces the confusion surrounding these multiple and conflicting usages. It also reveals how most usages tend to depoliticize our understanding of race. That is if used correctly, as we know there is good usage, bad usage, and usage.

“Breed” is not a term that is appropriate to the part of biology where they discuss Order, Genus, species, etc. “Breed” is relevant to biology, but only in the sense that humans have learned to selectively breed creatures to get the kind of characteristics that humans want. It does not belong in with the natural processes that produce genera, species, etc.

So in that sense, “breed” has no relevance to scientific classification. The most typical people in Malawi do not belong to a “breed,” nor do the Ainu people who live alongside the Japanese in Hokkaido, nor do the Swedes. Not only are individuals of those groups not members of different “breeds” (thank goodness humans have not even tried to sink to the level of breeding breeds of humans very often), they are not members of different subspecies.

What? “Very often”, What does that mean? However, this does not mean that someone or something else didn’t breed Humanity. Simply, let’s agree humanity is one race thus eliminating racism.

The genus designation is Homo, the species designation for every single human is sapiens, and the subspecies designation for all of us is sapiens, so the whole scientific classification is Homo sapiens sapiens. If Homo sapiens sapiens breaks down into smaller subdivisions, Asians, Africans, or whatever, those subdivisions would have to be called “sub-subspecies” or something like that.

No, No, No, because if we eliminate racism we can not separate one group of Humanity from another. Then what would the royals do? After all one breed of dog is not better than another breed of dog, now is it? Because Breed is a relevant scientific classification.

Spider with alien face
Damn, Did I get caught in the Man Mold?

People who classify creatures like spiders, (creatures that unlike humans don’t go flying all over the world all the time and exchanging genetic material in almost that widespread a way), don’t even have patience with the subspecies designation, claiming that most of the time the individuals refuse to conform to the scheme of categorization and it is more trouble than it is worth to try to figure out what some spider might “really” be. Humans have even less consistency in genetic makeup, yet for some perverse reason we insist on trying to divide them into sub-subspecies groups, or different races.

Human Race. Hue is just color
Human Race. Hue is just color

Yep, we are all of one race. It’s called the Human Race for a reason. Monkey Man is simply the mold in which ones Spirit is encapsulated to experience material life.

Whether one is of the Monkey Man Race, Insect Man Race, Reptile Man Race, etc., becomes only an issue of which mold was used to create the material body.

To evolve the Spirit within is the path we walk. Really, is there a difference in Spirit? Since Spirit is the source from which we ALL come.

Therefore, is one mold better than another? For the answer just ask the Cookie Baker. In fact, one may experience ALL the races before one evolves.

“While All is THE ALL, it is equally true that THE ALL is in All.

Damn, that Red Pill has a kick, doesn’t it?

Spirit and Playing with Reality
Flying on the Wings of Consciousness. With Creation under our Wings. NOW, that’s Freedom!

Knowledge is Power
Experience is Wisdom
Your Power is Yours

Thunderbird

Winky, My alter Ego
Hey, don’t look at ME! I have a different mold.

Monkey Man an Evolutionary process of the Spirit.

A Viscous Circle

A Viscous Circle maybe Viscous, However it’s not a Circle.

A Viscous Circle is not a Circle at all
It looks like a Butterfly, Stings like a Bee.  It’s A Viscous Circle

We live life in A Viscous Circle. Going in circles, chasing our own tales. This Viscous Circle is ominous until we open ourselves up to creation. Thus pop our Bubble of Perception. That’s when we become the all SEEing/Cing EYE/I . In truth it’s NOT A Viscous Circle at all here, but a Pyramid of Fear, Hope, and Doubt.

The Great Pyramid
Yep, the Great pyramid has eight sides

Sow, I choose to rename this post, The Power of the Pyramid, or better yet, Popping the Bubble of Perception.

A Viscous Circle, Living in FEAR, HOPE, and DOUBT

At the top of the system pyramid is the all SEEing I of FEAR. Fear is Mankind’s first natural enemy and a formidable one at that. Though I walk through the valley in the shadow of death, I will fear no evil. Fear is the controlling factor of the shadow world in which we perceive. Using ones LOVE of life to sell and buy ones soul. U C when we live in a mirror we SEE evil or good. LIVE mirrors EVIL  However, a New World Order is coming and in fact is already here. Not the one you have heard about or maybe thinking of in fear. You SEE they want you to Fear the New World Order because again you give your Power away to something outside of yourself. It doesn’t matter what you Fear as long as you Fear, Something, Anything. In that Fear one looks for Something, Anything to give them Hope that things will get better. If by chance they do. It wasn’t the Hope that change it now was it?

The_Last_HOPE
Hoping, it’s a reflection of an Illusion

Losing all HOPE, I HOPE you get this

Hope offers nothing but Hope it self. Hope in this, Hope in that. When one Hopes they do nothing but Hope. I call this Hopium. An Irrational and unwarranted optimism in the illusion of HOPE.

Have you had Your Hopium today? Hear, we can break apart the word HOPE to show the intent hidden inside the spell-ing. Yes, words cast spells it’s the magic of this world. To be-lie-ve a word like Hope can give you something other than hope itself. Which of course is an Illusion.

The Meaning of "You"
It’s a Viscous Circle When we live in an Illusion

Let’s begin, shall we?

(H) has a parallel structure like two walls standing side by side. Between the walls is a bridge. It’s been said… Don’t burn your Bridges. However, the Phoenix rises from the ashes now doesn’t it? Sow, H becomes the bridge to a parallel perception. Bridging perception between Heaven and Earth. It’s a MATTER of perception. Which one do you choose/prefer to SEE?

(O) of course is the void of Creation itself. It’s deep and dark. In truth it contains both light and dark, Let there BE Light! Where everything that is and ever will be, has and is already created in this Universe. Your here aren’t you? OH, yes you are!

The Spritt of Reflections
The Spirit of Reflection. Mirror, Mirror on the Wall is that ME in the ALL?

(P) is a mirror of sorts where only the upper right corner contains a reflection, Not even a full siDed reflection at that. However it is on the right upper side, sow it appears good. Leaving out three other reflections to our quad nature of Spirit. Picture a four-leaf clover with three leaves missing. Put Pee in your mouth and try not to spit it out. OK, Pees make you spit.

And (E), well that is consciousness. Could be yours or maybe it’s mine. Pay Attention to the advertising around you and you will soon SEE how your E is being manipulated. Those in the know already know about E. I AM just using words to play a game with your Consciousness. E is the electric part of ME, the intent sow to speak. Where M is the magnetic, the part that attracts and repels Creation in a positive or negative faction. I AM positive or AM I negative? When in truth we are both. As one can SEE when one Hopes they have Doubt.

I DOUBT it

Doubting in Creation brings Doubt within yourself. Doubt within yourself brings Hope of Something else. That something else brings Fear and we are off again looping in a preprogrammed Illusion of FEAR, HOPE, and DOUBT. Going in A Viscous Circle eating our own tails . Spinning constantly Spinning in the holy trinity of Fear, Hope, and Doubt. As you know, the (Be) in Doubt is silent. In Creation when one is in Doubt. Your (BE) is silenced.

Ouroboros

Pop this Bubble of Perception, open up to Creation to be who you truly aRe. The Spirit Breath of Creation. Creation can’t BE Creation without you, SEE/C?

Sow, ROW, ROW, ROW your boat.

The Energy Body And Dreams
The prize is you.  SURPRIZE !!!! Your Spirit is the essence of you!

What to make a Change?

Here’s a simple equation… I AM “THAT” I AM. Now replace “THAT” with any word in your vocabulary you choose to BE. It’s as simple as THAT. Be-cause in the beginning there was the word. And the word was…?

A Viscous Circle is Fear, Hope, Doubt. Not a circle at all. You’ll SEE for a change.

Replace these three words, FEAR, HOPE, DOUBT with any word in your vocabulary. Try LOVE, TRUST and UNITY, 4 A Change, not in any worldly system, but in Creation itself. Is all one need do. It MATTERS. Creation Be-comes you and ABRACADABRA…!

Don't sweat the small stuff
The Divine BEing of the Universe. A star is born.

YOU aRe CREATION.

The New World Order is NOW YOU! OR would you rather BE something else? What word will you be today?

I AM “THAT” I AM. Truth simply MATTERS.

Personally, I could care less which word you choose. Or choose not. Or what you want to BE or not BE. That’s up to you. It’s in LOVE, (The Law of Creation in the Truth of Consciousness), that I share. Thus, I write my BOOK of LIFE, write/rite/right/wright yours today! Or remain in the E-GYPT-IAN BOOK of THE DEAD.

(NOTE: Use the links to read my BOOK of LIFE in any order you feel on your path) , or don’t, who cares?

To BE or not to BE, that is the Question. Only you can answer “THAT”.

I AM “THAT” I AM

Spirit and Playing with Reality
Flying on the Wings of Consciousness. With the Wind of Creation under my Wings

POP!… Goes the Weasel.

I AM out of Here! SEE/C YA

Knowledge is Power
Experience is Wisdom
Take your Power Back

Fly on the Wings of Consciousness

Thunderbird

Winky, My alter Ego
I Wish I had Wings. Hey, Thunderbird can I catch a Ride?

You know,… I will change the post title again to… My BOOK of LIFE. WHY? Be-cause I can.

My project is done and turned in early on this Earth/Heart school. On to THE next Knowink in Consciousness.

Sow, I live my BOOK of LIFE. Not in A Viscous Circle of FEAR, HOPE, and DOUBT, in the BOOK of THE DEAD. In Creation where I BE ME.

 

Spiritual Beings

Spiritual Beings, Our Description of God, The Mold of Man

Spiritual Beings and the Mold of Man
Is God the Mold of Mankind? Become Spiritual Beings and see for yourself.

As Spiritual Beings, The Mold of Man is one of our sturdiest aspects of the First Attention Description. Our idea of God. Our aspect of God is like a powerful glue that binds our Assemblage Point to its original position. For Spiritual Beings to assemble another true world with another great band of the Eagles Emanations, it becomes necessary to take an obligatory step in order to release all ties from this world to move the Assemblage Point to aline the next world. In the world of our Dreams the Mold of Man will be found.

Before we go deeper into this Rabbit Hole. We must first discuss the Creation of Mankind and the stories behind our beliefs. We are all familiar with the creation story of the Bible. and other religions, so I will not reiterate them here. So if one is not afraid of the dark and willing to view God with a different perspective. Let’s become Rabbit Medicine and journey deeper into our description of God.

Of course if one feels God might become angry and punish them, it might be best that one keeps their description of God, and watch a ball game. God’s cool with that.

Or become Deer, as Deer offers another path to the Great Spirit. But there are demons along that path. One will need Heart to face the demons. All paths lead to the same place, the Great Spirit. It’s following the path with Heart that will make a difference in your life.

Spiritual Beings path
Follow the path with Heart to become Spiritual Beings

Spiritual Beings

The idea that there is a Spiritual reality to life is an ageless construct. Some religions have held the belief for thousands of years that our human bodies are mere vessels animated by our Spiritual Beings. Often accompanying this belief are doctrines concerning “reincarnation or afterlife.”

In the Christian religion, the word “soul” has long been used to reflect Spiritual Beings which survives death of the flesh and bone physical body. This begs the question, is the Mold of Man our physical body, or our Spiritual one?

By appealing to the persons vanity, it is easy to breed an animosity against new religions, new perspectives in otherwise tolerant people by presenting religious intolerance in psychological terms. As the Way, Salvation, Original Sin, and the likes. All creating a bias towards other beliefs.

Ironically, most of the anti-cult activism today comes from the so-called Christian “right-wing” in its effort to stamp out the “works of Satan,” which includes all religions not adhering to fundamentalist Christian beliefs. Of course, all religions have this built-in intolerance. Thus we keep fighting among ourselves. Therefore we lose sight of our true goal. Becoming  Spiritual Beings.

The greatest danger from a new perspective or religion, is not that it represent anything new or different, it is that it can become an effective tool for dividing people into factions, just as religions have done in the past. This can be accomplished through no fault of the religion/belief itself. Just by existing and being attacked, a modern religion may become an embattled faction when it finds itself operating in a social climate of “cult hysteria”. This type of social climate is easily generated today because most educated people fancy themselves knowledgeable about human psychology. But again have forgotten the Spiritual aspect of Humanity.

Spiritual beings having an Experience
This says it all. Seems we have a lot of things backwards.

Science has become the new religion. The scientific method is simply an attempt to understand and explore an area of knowledge in an intelligent and pragmatic fashion. It strives to find Cause and Effect relationships and to develop consistent axioms and techniques that will lead to predictable results. This is the type of methodology which needs to be, and can be applied to the realm of the Spirit, but it has not been done to any large degree.

The great universities and foundations are too busy with their “Man is Brain/Reason” studies to do more than superficial studies into the mounting evidence of our Spiritual existence. The major religions already have their “Word of God” writings and so they rarely undertake scientific studies into this area of Spirituality.

Since they believe, In the beginning there was the Word and the Word was God or with God. And the Word was printed in the book. It must be the Word of God. And if one reads it and studies it they will find their Spirituality. Well, hows that working so far?

Have we become more Spiritual because of the Word or less? One needs only to search their heart in truth to discover the answer. In fact less than 5 percent of Christ’s teaching are recorded in the Bible. What about the other 95 percent?

christ-on-the-cross
He had to die like this to teach us forgiveness. God needs to take a lesson from his son.

Some people deny the existence of a Supreme Being altogether. And it is difficult to blame them considering the level to which Spiritual knowledge has deteriorated. However, the overwhelming evidence of an individual Spiritual Beings existence and the many characteristics which all Spiritual Beings seem to share in common would suggest that a “Supreme Being” of some kind probably exists as a common source of all Spiritual existence. If a Supreme Being exists, it is likely that most people would not recognize it if they encountered it. Many individuals expect a Supreme Being to be a giant man in a flowing white beard, living on a cloud who rants, raves, and kills people. Others think that a Supreme Being is a bright light that exudes love and warmth. Still others perceive it as some completely unfathomable mystery that no one can ever hope to comprehend except through strained mystical contortions, rituals, and dress. A Supreme Being is probably none of these things. As the universe is never what it appears to be.

There are many ideas of what a Supreme Being might be. Perhaps the best way to tackle the issue of what the Supreme Being is. May be to first try to determine what individual Spiritual Beings are.

Shall we give it a go? This is going to be along article to make a point. Hey, What else have we got to do?

Spiritual Beings
We are Light Beings. As our DNA contains 1000 photons per DNA molecule.

Spiritual Beings, The Spirit of Mankind

Spiritual Beings appear to be something that is not a part of the physical universe, and yet it possesses both external awareness and self-awareness.

The mounting scientific evidence of Spiritual immortality in near-death episodes and in documented past-life memories indicates that Spiritual Beings are best defined as timeless and indestructible units of consciousness. Every Spiritual Being, or unit of consciousness, seems to be completely different and independent. Each appears to possess its own distinct perspective which cannot be entirely duplicated by any other unit of consciousness. This uniqueness and individuality of perception appear to be the very essence and purpose of Spiritual existence. We see evidence of this when individuals are crushed into a sameness, they become unhappier and worse off. Their perceptions deteriorate and they are less creative.

When true uniqueness and individuality are restored, we regain our vitality and creativity. It appears that every unit of consciousness is capable of infinite creation because creation by Spiritual Beings is accomplished by the acts of feelings, thoughts, and actions. This is where Heartmind comes to fruition.

Pink Elephant
See here’s a real Pink Elephant

If we feel and then reason that there is a pink elephant in the room, we have created a pink elephant, even if it only exists in our mind. Such creations, when shared and agreed to by others, eventually give rise to universes that can be shared and experienced by all others.

This seems to be how Spiritual Beings create Parallel Realities and Dimensional Shifts of their own and in cooperation with others, and why there exists evidence in modern physics that our universe appears to be ultimately based in consciousness.

For any universe or reality to exist, an infinity must first exist in which a universe or reality maybe placed. All reality, including this material universe, arise out of this infinity and not vice versa, this has been demonstrated by some remarkable mathematics being done at various universities.

Every unit of consciousness is the source of its own infinity because consciousness has no bounds, any amount of space, time or matter may be imagined by any Spiritual Beings and ultimately agreed to and shared by other Spiritual Beings. This would be an interesting experience to have seven or eight people agree there is something in the room, Pink Elephant, that they all agree on. And then bring somebody else into the room to see if they can see it as well. Of course the seven or eight people would have to have a detailed description of the object. Great party fun.

Where did all of these countless units of consciousness come from? Did there exist at one time only a single unit of consciousness from which all others originated? May be a singularity or God. The many similarities between all Spiritual Beings make it appear so. That original unit of consciousness would be what is normally called a Supreme Being, which we might also call the Primary Being.

The creation of Man
We can Transcend our suffering by becoming Spiritual Beings

It appears that individual Spiritual Beings are actually the units of consciousness of a Primary, or Supreme, Being, yet each unit is possessed of its own self-awareness, personality, freewill, independent feelings, thoughts, and infinite creativity.

This would mean that a Supreme Being had created, or had given “birth” to, an infinite number of unique and individual units of consciousness through which that Supreme Being could experience the infinities, universes, and realities which all of those Spiritual Beings could freely and independently create. Using the Mold of Man to stamp the beings out of its self. A Supreme Being might be very crudely likened to a person sitting in a television control booth who puts out trillions of video cameras. Each camera (Spiritual Being) feeds a picture into its own individual monitor screen in the control booth to be viewed by the (Supreme Being). Each camera is situated a little differently and so each has a different viewpoint or perspective. Each camera is also capable of creating its own “special effects” (universes).

At this point, one might ask, How could a Supreme Being have been so foolish? Why would it create awareness units that were self-aware? After all, it is the quality of self-awareness, or the consciousness of being aware, that allows Spiritual Beings to be completely independent and to engage in the silliness which has caused them to suffer the sorry plight that they now appear to be enduring on Earth and probably elsewhere. Why did a Supreme Being not simply throw out an enormous number of consciousness units that were only externally aware having no consciousness of their own existences? Better yet, why did a Supreme Being not do the reasonable thing and simply retain its own single undivided consciousness?

Spiritual Beings
Since we all come from the Source Being we become the Source. Each and every one of us becomes its own creation

Self Awareness becomes the source of Infinity or Infinities

Self-awareness is apparently the quality which gives the Spiritual Beings the capacity for consciousness, and therefore to be a source of infinity and creation. Without self-awareness, Spiritual Beings could not create their own reality. Self-awareness appears to act as the “mirror” against which Spiritual Beings can become a source of an infinity, and within that infinity can create realities and universes. Of course, a Supreme Being is already capable of creating an infinity and creating anything within it, but only from its own single perspective. A Supreme Being could only be the source of one infinity. Its own.

If a Supreme Being wanted to experience another infinity, it has to first create another unique self-aware unit of self-consciousness like itself.

Presto! It apparently did just that. However it did not satisfy itself with just one more unit of consciousness. No way Jose, it appears to have stamped out an infinite number of them so that it could enjoy an almost infinite number of infinities and realities. This suggests that the potential scope of a Supreme Being extends far beyond the boundaries of this one small universe, it encompasses trillions of potential infinities and universes.

Or one can simply believe God is a man on a cloud keeping track of your sins so he can punish you later.

Spiritual Beings Logic
Ok, That sounds Reasonable. Great that gives me a reason for the Reason for GOD

But Aha!” you might interject. “By definition, only one infinity can exist. It is redundant for something already capable of infinite creation to expand itself. Infinity multiplied by infinite trillions is still infinity. Fair enough, but our infinity appears to be solely the product of our human perspective. Only units of self consciousness are capable of perceiving. Therefore there could exist as many infinities as there are units of consciousness (Spiritual Beings). Infinity does not arise out of the mechanical universe, or from any of its laws. Rather, the mechanical universe and its laws all appear to arise out of infinity. Hello, we have to see the bigger picture if we are to see at all.

So what went wrong? How did so many Spiritual Beings, each capable of infinite creation, wind up with such a dull creation on Earth thinking that we are nothing more than meat and electricity?

Spiritual Beings Body
Just Meat and Electricity. Yea, Right. Where does that Electricity come from?

What?  You want me to answer all the questions of life for you without you having to do any investigation for your self?

There are apparently many factors that caused this, I will leave it to you to discover your own reasons for your existence and how you became trap in Reason. I will only add that Spiritual Beings can become hopelessly caught up in the labyrinths of their own intricate creations, that’s a matter of fact.

Although the universe appears to operate on very simple building blocks, once those blocks are put into place and other beings are introduced, a universe can become extremely complex and solid-looking, like the universe we share now.

Humm, could there be other awareness out there that have their own self-awareness? What might their intent be? Another interesting note, is all matter that can be seen in this Universe makes up less than 5 percent of the entire Universe. This sure leaves a lot of unknowns out there.

I will add this, When Spiritual Beings become fixated in those universes, they become like cameras anchored in a dense rain forest. The cameras are unable to perceive beyond the foliage of their own creation directly in front of them. After staring at the foliage for a long time, the cameras may begin to believe that they, too, are nothing but foliage, and they forget that they are cameras (Spiritual Beings).

Salvation would come by restoring to those cameras their true self-identities and by giving them the ability to come and go from the rain forest at will. Dreams are a way of discovering a way out of this jungle of matter.

When we look at individual Spiritual Beings on Earth, we see that we are very small in relation to the universe at large. This is the situation that apparently occurs when Spiritual Beings become trapped in physical bodies or other physical objects. In that state, Spiritual Beings have lost their power to change perspective in relation to the physical universe. Perspective is apparently what determines the “size” of a Spiritual Being.

Have you ever stood on top of a skyscraper and looked down? Your first reaction might be, “Gee, those people sure are small. They’re the size of ants!” Those people look so small, and really are so small, because you simply changed your perspective.

Spiritual Beings Solar System
What we have been taught is not how reality works

Spiritual Beings in an entrapped state of matter can apparently change perspective in the same way in relation to the entire physical universe. The universe can appear no larger than a coffee cup, or an atom the size of a mountain. This is apparently how Spiritual Beings become “bigger or smaller”. Changing perspective in this fashion is not an act of mere thinking. It is a matter of actually shifting direct Spiritual perception in a real and tangible fashion as the person who hops on an elevator to the top of a skyscraper.

Spiritual Beings on Earth are largely confined to the single perspective dictated by the physical bodies they animate and the description we were taught. Mental perspectives can change, (Change a belief, Change reality), but not the direct perspective of the Spiritual Being in relation to the universe itself.

Some mystical religions teach that one’s ultimate Spiritual aim should be to permanently “merge with or rejoin” with Supreme Being. This appears to me to be a false goal. If Spiritual Beings were created to act as unique and independent consciousness, it would be contrary to the purpose of creation to permanently “merge” with another  consciousness or with a Supreme Being for that matter. It may not even be possible to do so.

The true goal of any salvation program should be to fully recover one’s unique Spiritual self-awareness and perspective. Of course this is just my perspective, and yours I am sure is different from mine. However as I share my perspective with the Supreme Being, I share it with you as well. How else will we see a different perspective. Or may be something that we may all find salvation through. As this involves you becoming aware of yourself and not somebody else suffering for you. Suffer your own injustices after all you created them.

Wholly Smokes, I haven’t even gotten to the Mold of Man yet, as we still have one more thing to discuss here. And that’s the Creation of Mankind. However I am not going to go over the religious descriptions as one can find those anywhere. There’s one you may not have heard which for me makes more sense but again that’s my perspective. So if your up for going even deeper into the Rabbit hole, grab a carrot and let’s go.

Spiritual Symbolism
Spiritual Symbolism, this sign is engraved all over the world.

The Creation of Mankind on Planet Earth.

Some claim that an ancient wisdom about Spirit had once existed. If such a wisdom ever did exist, and it does, it long ago became hopelessly muddled by countless false ideas, strange mystical beliefs and practices, incomprehensible symbolism, and wrong scientific teachings and religions of the past and present. As one will find this has been done to keep Mankind trapped in a matter reality.

As a result, the subject of the Spirit is today almost unrecognizable. On top of that, many scholars trained in Western scientific methods reject the idea of a spirit entirely, apparently because they cannot put a Spirit under a microscope and watch its squiggle, or plant electrodes in it and give it a jolt.

So how did this all start? Why was Mankind created? What are we here for?  

The idea that human beings were created as a slave race owned by an extraterrestrial society is not a new one. It was expressed thousands of years ago in mankind’s earliest recorded civilizations. The first of those civilizations was Sumeria. A remarkably advanced society which arose in the Tigris-Euphrates River valley between 5000 and 4000 B.C., and flourished as a major
civilization by 3500 B.C. It seems it just appeared out of nowhere.

Spiritual Religions
Divide and Conquer in the name of Religions

Like other ancient societies which arose in the Mesopotamian region, Sumeria left records stating that human like creatures of extraterrestrial origin had ruled early human society as Earth’s first monarchs. Those alien people were often thought of as “Gods”. Some Sumerian “Gods” were said to travel in the skies and through the heavens in flying “globes” and rocket like vehicles. Ancient carvings depict several “Gods” wearing goggle like apparel over their eyes. Human priests acted as mere intermediaries between the alien “Gods” and the human population. This became the Royal blood lines. Or so they would like to believe.

However not all Mesopotamian Gods were human like extraterrestrials. Some were obvious fabrications, and fictitious attributes were often ascribed to the extraterrestrial human like Gods. Once the obvious fictions are stripped away, however, we discover within the Mesopotamian writings a distinct class of beings who do indeed fit the “God” mold. Historical records and modern testimony describe them as physically human like, racially diverse, and most importantly, very similar to human beings in behavior.

Anunnaki tablet
It your fault. No It’s your fault.

Because God is not the right description for them, I will use “Visitors”. As that is what they are. They were not created here on earth. Just because they haven’t left yet does change the fact. They have had an extended stay that may be coming to an end as humanity begins to wake up to the fact that they exist. And that they are not Gods.

The ancient writers describe their extraterrestrial “Gods” as being capable of love, hate, amusement, anger, honesty, and depravity. Ancient records and modern testimony would indicate that Visitors personalities run the entire gamut from saints, sinners, to angels from the most degraded of awareness, to the most loving of humanitarians.

Makes them more like us or better said, us like them. After all children learn what they live.

Sumerian Tablet
The Gods were Giants among Mankind. Big but not Gods.

The Visitors had male and female bodies, and they bred by sexual intercourse. Ancient Mesopotamian tablets credit one of the Visitors in particular was supervising the genetic manufacture of Homo Sapiens.

That “Visitors” name was Ea. Ea was reported to be the son of an extraterrestrial king who was said to rule another planet (Nibiru) within the far reaches of the Visitors empire. Prince Ea was known by the title, “EN.KI,” which means “(lord or prince) of Earth”. Ancient Sumerian texts reveal that Ea’s title was not entirely accurate because Ea was said to have lost his dominion over major portions of Earth to his half-brother, Enlil, during one of the innumerable rivalries and intrigues that seemed to forever preoccupy the Visitors ruler.

As above so below. The Mesopotamian texts portray Ea as an advocate who spoke before the Visitors councils on behalf of the new Earth race. He opposed many of the cruelties that other Visitors imposed, including his half-brother, Enlil, inflicted upon human beings. It would seem from Sumerian tablets that Ea did not intend Homo Sapiens to be harshly treated, but his wishes in that regard were overruled by the other leaders. As we see, our ancient and highly civilized ancestors told a very different story of humanity’s emergence on Earth than what we have been told today.

The Mesopotamians were clearly not schooled in Darwinian theories of evolution! Nevertheless, there is some surprising anthropological evidence to support the Sumerian version of prehistory.

The Old Testament tells us that Adam (first man) was designed to be a servant. His function was to till the soil and to care for the lush gardens and crops owned by his “God.” As long as Adam and Eve accepted their servant status and obeyed their ever-present masters, all of their physical needs would be met and they would be permitted to remain in their “paradise” indefinitely. There was, of course, one unpardonable sin that they must never commit. They must never attempt to seek certain types of knowledge. Those forbidden forms of knowledge are symbolized in the story as two trees. The “Tree of Knowledge of good and evil” and the “Tree of Life.”

Sumerian Tablet
The Tree of Life

The first tree symbolizes an understanding of ethics and justice. The second tree symbolizes the knowledge of how to regain and retain one’s Spiritual identity and immortality.

Adam and Eve obeyed the commandments of their masters and lived in material bliss until another party entered the scene. The intervening party was symbolized in the story as a snake/serpent. The serpent convinced Eve to partake of the “fruit” from the “Tree of Knowledge of good and evil”. Eve followed the serpent’s suggestion, as did Adam. “God” (i.e., The Visitor leadership) became immediately alarmed.

And the Lord, God said. “Look, the man has become as one of us, knowing good from evil. And now, what if he puts forth his hand, and takes also of the Tree of Life, and eats, and lives forever?” (WTF, We better do something about this and fast!) Implied
GENESIS 3:22

Original Sin
Ah, come on! An Apple Really! The Greatest Story ever told. Has a snake in it too!

The above passage reveals an important truth echoed by many religions. A true understanding of ethics, integrity, and justice is a prerequisite to regaining one’s Spiritual freedom and immortality. Without a foundation in ethics, full Spiritual recovery becomes nothing more than a pipe dream. Step away from the bong! The Visitors clearly did not want mankind to begin traveling the road to Spiritual recovery. The reason is obvious.

The Visitors needed slaves. It is difficult to make people who maintain their integrity and their sense of ethics. To be slaves to others. It becomes impossible when those same individuals are undisturbed by physical threats due to a reawakening of their Spiritual immortality. Most importantly, if Spiritual Beings could no longer be trapped in human bodies, but instead could use and abandon their bodies at will, there would be no Spiritual Beings available to animate the slave bodies. Then what would the Visitors do with all those clones?

A common misinterpretation of the Adam and Eve story is that the “Original Sin” had something to do with sex or nudity. This confusion comes from that part of the story in which Adam and Eve eat from the “Tree of Knowledge”, and immediately became ashamed of their nakedness. It was not nudity, that shamed them. Adam and Eve became mortified by what their nakedness represented.

Ancient Mesopotamian records depict human beings as being stark naked when performing tasks for their Visitor masters. The Visitors, however, were depicted as being fully clothed. The implication is that Adam and Eve felt degraded by their nakedness because it was a sign of their enslavement. Not because being naked in itself is bad. There is also the idea that knowledge is clothing. Being fully clothed would mean in full knowledge.

Nudity is not being naked
Come on Adam, We aren’t naked. We are Slaves!

If we compare ancient and modern ideas about how mankind came into existence, we find two very different versions. The ancient version is that an extraterrestrial society had come to possess Earth and sought to exploit the planet’s resources.

To make the exploitation easier, a work race was created, Homo Sapiens. Humans were treated as livestock and were often butchered when they became too numerous, troublesome or noisy as the story goes. To preserve Homo Sapiens as a slave race and to prevent future rebellion, Spiritual Knowledge had to be repressed, human beings were scattered geographically into different linguistic groups, (Tower of Babel) and conditions were created to make physical survival on Earth an all-consuming chore from birth until death.

Sounds like life now doesn’t it? It appears nothing has changed in almost six thousand of years. What isn’t being told is that Man had become like the Gods after eating the Fruit and was building a launch pad and spacecraft to visit the stars just like the Gods do. And the Gods couldn’t have that now could they?

This arrangement was to be maintained indefinitely for as long as the Visitors Society possessed Earth. In contrast, the modern view is that human beings had evolved accidentally from “star-dust” into slime, into fishes, into monkeys, and finally into people. How did the first cells know to become a heart or a brain cell? The modern view actually seems more fanciful than the ancient one. Of course one can believe what they want to believe. But hey where’s the proof? Where’s the missing link?

Missing Link
I can’t say where it is. I can’t see where it is, What, I can’t hear you.

In the story of Adam and Eve we noted the appearance of a snake. The serpent was said to be “God’s” enemy, Satan, who had literally transformed himself into a reptile. Yet, God didn’t know his enemy was in the Garden. The Bible suggests that snakes are feared and disliked today because of Satan’s alleged transformation back in the Garden of Eden. However, it should be remembered that the Biblical Adam and Eve story is entirely symbolic. Taken from older writings and written in the Bible. The snake, was a symbol, not an actual reptile. God sure was careless with his creation allowing his children to play around snakes.

To determine what the Biblical snake represented, we must go back once again to older pre-biblical sources. When we do, we discover that the snake symbol had two very important meanings in the ancient world. It was associated with the Visitor “God” Ea, the historical creator and benefactor of mankind, and it also represented an influential organization with which Ea was associated.

Snake Totem and the tree of Knowledge
Snake a sacred Symbol for Spiritual Beings. But be careful it doesn’t have the same meaning any more.

Of all the animals revered in ancient human societies, none were as prominent or important as the snake. The snake was the logo of Ea’s group which had become very influential in early human societies on both Hemispheres. That group was a disciplined known as the Brotherhood dedicated to the dissemination of Spiritual Knowledge and the attainment of Spiritual freedom.

This Brotherhood of the Snake (also known as the “Brotherhood of the Serpent”). The Brotherhood also imparted scientific knowledge and encouraged the high aesthetics that existed in many ancient societies. For these and other reasons, the snake had become a venerated symbol to humans and, according to Egyptian and biblical texts, an object of the Visitor leadership hatred.

When we look to discover who founded the Brotherhood, Mesopotamian texts it points right back to that rebellious “God,” Prince Ea. Ancient Mesopotamian tablets relate that Ea and his father, Anu, possessed profound ethical and Spiritual knowledge. This was the same knowledge that was symbolized as trees in the Biblical Adam and Eve story.

In fact, the Biblical tree symbol came from pre-biblical Mesopotamian works, such as the one showing a snake wrapped around the trunk of a tree, identical to later portrayals of the snake in Eden. From the tree in the Mesopotamian depiction hung two pieces of fruit. To the right of the tree is the half-moon symbol of Ea; to the left is the planet symbol of Anu. The drawing indicates that Ea and Anu were associated with the snake and its teachings. This connection is affirmed by other Mesopotamian texts which describe Anu’s palace in the “heavens” as being guarded by a God of the Tree of Truth and a God of the Tree of Life.

Tree of Knowledge
Oh Adam, It’s good to eat.

We therefore find Ea designated as the culprit who tried to teach early man (Adam) the way to Spiritual freedom. This suggests that Ea intended his creation, Homo Sapiens, to be suited for Earth labor, but at some point he changed his mind about using Spiritual enslavement as the means.

If Ea was a true historical personality as the Sumerians claimed, then he was the probable leader of the Brotherhood of the Snake at its founding on Earth. The Brotherhood may have adopted the snake as its logo because Ea’s first home on Earth was said to have been constructed by a serpent-infested swampland which Ea called Snake Marsh. Another possible explanation for the snake logo is the biblical word for snake (nahash), which comes from the root word NHSH, meaning “to decipher, to find out.”

Despite all of their reported good intentions, the legendary Ea and early Brotherhood clearly failed to free the human race. Ancient Mesopotamian, Egyptian, and biblical texts relate that the “snake” was quickly defeated by the other Visitor factions. The Bible informs us that the serpent in the Garden of Eden was overcome before it was able to complete its mission and give Adam and Eve the “fruit” from the second tree. The Tree of Life. Ea (who was also symbolized as a snake) was banished to Earth and was extensively demonized by his opponents to ensure that he could never again secure a widespread following among human beings.

The Devil
Oh, come on. Do I have to wear this costume?

Ea’s title was changed from “Prince of Earth” to “Prince of Darkness”. He was labeled with other horrible titles as well. Like Satan, the Devil, Evil Incarnate, Monarch of Hell, Lord of Vermin, Prince of Liars, and more. He was portrayed as the mortal enemy of a Supreme Being and as the keeper of Hell. People were taught that his only intentions were to Spiritually enslave everyone and that everything bad on Earth was caused by him. Humans were encouraged to detect him in all of his future lives (“incarnations”) and to destroy him and his creations whenever he was discovered.

Yep, we have enter the darkness. It appears the ancient records goes against what we have been currently taught. Go Figure.

If one just takes a moment and considers. Why would the Snake in the garden tell Eve about the Tree of Knowledge. And why an all-knowing and all-seeing God didn’t know the snake was there. One may find that the record from the past tells more of the story than the bible does. I am not telling anyone what to believe, I am just offering a different perspective that comes from writings older than the Bible. One can take it or leave it after all it’s your Spiritual freedom at stake.

A Stairway tp Heaven
The path to Spirituality requires Heart

All beliefs and practices named after EA various affiliations such as (“Satanism, Devil Worship,” etc.) were to be made so horrific and degrade anyone interested in discovering Spirituality would be damned to hell. Therefore no right-thinking person would, or should, have anything to do with them.

Just keep your head down and do what God tells you to do. He and his followers were to be viewed by human beings with nothing but the utmost loathing. Look how good it worked.  Just change a name and put evil attributes to that name and presto! Yet why is it that all the evil doers seem to prosper and all us do gooders continue in slavery?

This is not to say that Ea was actually portrayed by ancient Sumerians as a saint. He was not. Ea wound up giving his enemies a powerful tool of Spiritual repression. Ea then appears to have compounded the blunder by founding and/or empowering the early Snake Brotherhood which, after its reported defeat, continued to remain a powerful force in human affairs, working for the enslavement of mankind under the domination of the very Visitor factions that Ea and the original Brotherhood were said to have opposed.

Ancient history indicates that the Brotherhood was turned under its new Visitor “Gods” into a powerful weapon of Spiritual repression and betrayal, despite the efforts of many sincere humanitarians to bring about true Spiritual reform through Brotherhood channels all the way up until today. By reportedly creating a work race and the Brotherhood of the Snake, the “God” Ea had helped build a trap for billions of Spiritual Beings on Earth. Now using the Brotherhood against Spiritual freedom. Am I suggesting that one worship Satan?

The Mastery of Awareness
Why Worship anything? Do we really need something else to discover what we truly are?

HELL NO! What this says to me is that these Visitors are not GODS never have been, never will be. It appears to me, they are just as screwed up as you and me. I brought this point up because it seems a number of individuals are Feeding the Beast without knowing what the Ancient Records truly indicate. And in fact are not even sure which God they worship. They have been told a story and believe a story without checking on the facts. If one wants to keep it real? What has changed in over two thousand years of worship of this God of the bible? Has the World become a better place? HELL NO! If anything it has become worse. More separation, more fighting, and killing. If I would suggest anything. It would be to withhold ones worship from any being.

The true source of creation doesn’t need worship. It’s your Spirit, your consciousness that was given to you. Take the time to discover it before one goes and gives it away to some undeserving being pretending to be a God. At the very least make them prove them self to you. It sounds to me, that they need us more than we need them. They created us to be a servant. Ooops, sorry we ate the apple. Now what?

Sentient Beings
I am a Spiritual Being as well. I just have a different Mold than you.

The Mold Of Man

Ok, finally we have arrived. That is if you is still reading this post. Damn this has been a lot of work just to find our Spirituality. So let’s see the Mold of Man. When The Mold of Man is seen, Please don’t fall down upon your knees and worship this. Would one worship a blender? Because it makes the perfect Margarita? Or toaster because it makes perfect Toast?

The self-confidence of the warrior is not the self-confidence of the average man. The average man seeks an agreement in the eyes of the onlooker and calls that self-confidence. He seeks reassurance from the world around him. The warrior seeks impeccability in his own eyes and calls that humbleness. The average man is hooked to his fellow-men, through an agreement of the description. While the warrior is hooked only to infinity and stands in awe at the wonder of it.

The first step to see the Mold of Man. One needs to realize, the Mold of Man is a huge cluster of the Eagle’s Emanations in the great bands of organic life. It is called the Mold of Man because the cluster appears only inside the cocoon of man. Inside our Energy Body. The Mold of Man is the portion of the Eagle’s Emanations that seers can see directly without any danger to themselves.

Viewing the Mold of Man
I am melting into the light.

The old seers as well as the mystics of our world have one thing in common. They have been able to see the Mold of Man, but have not understood what it is. Mystics, throughout the centuries, have given us moving accounts of their experiences. But these accounts, however beautiful, are flawed by the gross and despairing mistake of believing the Mold of Man to be an omnipotent, omniscient creator; and so is the interpretation of the old seers, who called the Mold of Man a friendly spirit, a protector and savior of man.

The new seers are the only ones who have the sobriety to see the Mold of Man and understand what it is. What we have come to realize is that the Mold of Man is not the creator, but the pattern of every human attribute we can think of and some we cannot even conceive. The Mold is our God in a sense, because we are what it stamps us with and not because it has created us from nothing and made us in its image and likeness. To fall on our knees in the presence of the Mold of Man reeks of arrogance and human self centeredness, in other words Self Importance.

The Face of the Great Spirit
No I am not God either. But I do grant Gifts of Life. If one can dart pass me, they will be free.

The Mold of Man is a pattern of energy that serves to stamp the qualities of humanness on an amorphous blob of biological matter, called DNA the building Blocks of life. Using a mechanical analogy, it is like a gigantic die that stamps out human beings endlessly as if they were coming to it on a mass-production conveyor belt.

All species have a mold of its own, and every individual of every species molded by the process shows characteristics particular to its own kind. Hence the name. The Mold of Man.

The belief that the biblical God exists is based on Blind Faith and, as such, is a second-hand conviction that does not amount to a hill of beans. As most people’s belief in the existence of God is based on hearsay and not on the act of seeing. Even when or if, you are able to see The Mold of Man, one is bound to make the same misjudgment that mystics have made. Anyone who sees the Mold of Man automatically assumes that it is God. We all know what happens when one ass-u-mes.

The mystical experience of the mystics is a chance seeing, a one-shot affair that has no significance whatsoever because it is the result of a random movement of the assemblage point. The new seers are indeed the only ones who can pass a fair judgment on this matter, because they have ruled out chance seeing and are capable of seeing the Mold of Man as often as they please.

We have seen, therefore, that what we call God is a static prototype of humanness without any power or feeling whatsoever. For the Mold of Man cannot under any circumstances help us by intervening in our behalf, or punish for our wrong doings, or reward us in any way. We are simply the product of its stamp; we are its impression. The Mold of Man is exactly what its name tells us it is, a pattern, a form, a cast that groups together a particular bunch of fiber-like elements, which we call mankind.

Spiritual Beings viewing the source
Mirror, Mirror on the wall who’s the fairest of them all?

When our assemblage point is moving away from its customary position and reaches a certain depth, within our energy body it breaks a barrier that momentarily disrupts its capacity to align emanations. We experience it as a moment of perceptual blankness. The old seers called that moment the wall of fog, because a bank of fog appears when the alignment of emanations falters. As we perceive nothing just like in a thick fog.

The Mastery of Awareness is what gives our assemblage point its boost. After all, there is really very little to us human beings, we are in essence, an assemblage point fixed at a certain position on our energy body.

Our enemy, and at the same time our friend is our internal dialogue, our inventory or description. Be a warrior; shut off your internal dialogue, make your inventory and then throw it away. The new seers make accurate inventories and then laugh at them. Without the inventory the assemblage point becomes free to a line new worlds, new emanations.

We have to go beyond the Mold, the mold is merely a stage, a stop over that brings temporary peace and serenity to those who journey into the unknown, but it is sterile, static, without power. It is at the same time a flat reflected image in a mirror and at the same time the mirror itself. And the image of the perfect man, but is still only an image.

Live in your Heart
The image of the perfect Spiritual being is only an image.

Why do so many people continue to wear the chains of bondage that prevent them from being who they truly are? What motivates the fear that fosters their conformity to being sheeple, just another face in the crowd hiding their head in the sand?

It seems as though their fear is grounded in their unprecedented need to conform, they cling mysteriously, to something they don’t even know or understand and which is devoid of truth. This momentous amount of Blind Faith has been energetically fueling a prophetic myth for a very, very long time and is evidence of the power that the Spirit of man has, the ability to which each individual can individually and cumulatively create reality. People seem to place more value on freedom, more than any other thing. Yet they consistently refuse to claim it as their birthright.

Or even begin to attempt to fathom the hypocrisy of religious freedom is beyond me. How can one be free when they must conform to another’s Ideals or beliefs. We worship a god that has done nothing but enslave us, curse us, and kill us. And yet we call that love.

We must lose our human form. And yet we know nothing about the Mold of Man, the human form, or our Spirituality. The human form is the force of Spirit and the Mold of Man is … well … a mold. The human form is a sticky force that makes us the Spiritual Beings that we are. The human form has no form, but in spite of not having form, it possesses us during our lives and doesn’t leave us until the moment of death.

Death
You have the wrong image of me as well.

The only thing that makes one think we are our self is the human form. Once it leaves, we are nothing. Yet we become everything. Everything we see is a reflection of the world of a description. We talk and act the way we do because we clinging to our human form. We are human creatures, we have Spirit. Who knows what’s waiting for us or what kind of power we may have.

Our Reason is the demon that keeps us chained. We have to vanquish it if we want to achieve the realization of being Spirit. The issue for me, has been how to vanquish my Reason.

By Reason, I don’t mean the capacity for comprehending, inferring or thinking, in an orderly, rational way. To me reason means attention or Tonal. Our first attention and the description it inventories. The daily world exists because we know how to hold its images. We have been taught this from birth, consequently, if one drops the attention needed to maintain these images, the world collapses.

Once one gets their attention on the images of their dreams, their attention is hooked for good. In the end one can hold the images of any dream for an infinity.

The Mastery of Awareness
What a great Dream we have created together

We choose only once. We choose either to be warriors or to be ordinary humans. A second choice does not exist. Not on this earth. The problem for us therefore becomes a challenge. Whether or not we will be capable of developing our will, the power of our second attention to focus indefinitely on anything we want. As Spiritual Beings, The Mold of Man is one of our sturdiest aspects of the First Attention Description. Our idea of God. Our aspect of God is like a powerful glue that binds our Assemblage Point to its original position.

For Spiritual Beings to assemble another true world with another great band of the Eagles Emanations, it becomes necessary to take an obligatory step to release all ties from this world description to move the Assemblage Point to aline the new worlds.

In the world of our Dreams the Mold of Man stands before the gateway to the next world. We must change our belief of God before we truly know God. As God is not a belief. God is an experience.

Feeding the Beast
Ok, which one of you is God? God is all of them!

Go experience God for your self. That way you will know the truth. We are Spiritual Beings aren’t we? Spiritual Beings can talk with other Spiritual Beings, see if you get a response from the Mold of Man.

The power in Spirit.
We can Fly on the Wings of Consciousness, or remain grounded to an old Description

Knowledge is Power

Experience is Wisdom

Take your Power Back

Spiritual Beings become Spiritual

Thunderbird

Winky, thumbs up to you
I am a Spiritual Orb. Orbs are people too!

 The Mold of Man is … Well … a mold. Spiritual Beings  are …Well … Spirit.