The Moon shouldn’t really be there. Is The Moon a Giant Spacecraft?
For most people, we often marvel at the beauty of a sunrise or the magnificence of a full Moon, but it is impossible to fathom the magnitude of the universe that surrounds us. For many reasons the Moon should not exit were it does. Yet, there it is. Was searching around one day and found a site that suggested the Moon was a Hologram. Well if reality can be a hologram why not The Moon? This got me wondering.
The Moon is the only natural satellite of the Earth and the fifth largest moon in the Solar System. It is the largest satellite of a planet in our Solar System relative to the size of its primary planet, the question remains is it natural?
Distance to Earth: 238,900 miles (384,400 km)
Orbital period: 27 days
Gravity: 1.622 m/s²
Age: 4.527 billion years. How do they know? Can one date Rock?
Circumference: 6,784 miles (10,917 km)
I investigated further and found all kinds of interesting stuff, some entertaining to say the least. Some I wish to share. As a Mind is a terrible thing to waste. I have to admit, I have kept an eye on The Moon and noticed some unexplainable goings on myself.
Everyone is a Moon, and has a dark side which he never shows to anybody. (Mark Twain)
Not sure if many of you are aware of the theory that The Moon isn’t a natural product of our solar system, but rather a hollowed out planetoid spacecraft hollowed out to house certain entities. I have never actually read the book, “Who Built the Moon?” by Christopher Knight, I did hear him and his partner on Coast to Coast. Which started me doing some research around the subject. It appears that scientists are also confounded with The Moon, it’s purpose, how it got there, and why it is so large? Apparently it’s not supposed to be where it is, and it doesn’t adhere to the rules of astrophysics. In short, scientists have come to the conclusion that The Moon shouldn’t really be there.
Going back into ancient civilizations, there are a myriad odd tales and cultural stories that talk about an egg being hollowed out and rolled across the sky, and some of the descriptions are eerily similar to the description of our Moon. It’s really interesting stuff when one stops to consider the abnormalities.
Zulu Mythology about the Moon
Zulu Shaman, Credo Mutwa said that Zulu legends believe The Moon to be hollow and the home of the Python or hitauri or as David Icke calls them the Reptilians”, a race of intelligent extraterrestrials. The legend states The Moon was brought here hundreds of generations ago by two brothers, Wowane and Mpanku, who were the leaders of these Reptilian extraterrestrials.
These two were known as the water brothers and they both had scaly skin like a fish. This tale is very similar to the Mesopotamia and Sumerian accounts about the two chief leader brothers Enlil and Enki, (Lords of the Earth). Credo continues telling the Zulu legends of how Wowane and Mpanku stole The Moon in the form of an egg from the “Great Fire Dragon,” and emptied out the yolk until it was hollow. Then they “rolled” The Moon across the sky to the Earth which brought about cataclysmic events on this planet that ended the “Golden Age” of the past.
Credo Mutwa claims that the Earth was very different then it is now before The Moon had arrived. There weren’t any seasons and the planet was perpetually engulfed by a canopy of water vapor. People did not feel the strong glare of the Sun that we do now, and they could only see it through a watery mist. The Earth was once a beautiful place, a lovely place, lush and green with giant Redwoods, Violets and Ferns with a gentle drizzle and mist. The water canopy fell to the Earth as a cataclysm of rain when The Moon was put into place in the Earth’s orbit. This is symbolized in the Bible when it rains for 40 days and 40 nights.
The arrival of The Moon and the Reptilians changed everything on Earth. It modified the Earth’s rotation and angle. The earth turned over on its axis as we are upside down, as the legend says, and brought more powerful tidal systems that once had been much calmer. Women did not menstruate before The Moon arrived.
Zulus and other native African accounts say The Moon was built far, far, away to keep an eye on people, and as a vehicle to travel the Universe. Credo says that the Reptilians “Giant Mother-ship” is The Moon and that’s where they escaped to during the cataclysms of the “Great Flood,” which they had caused by manipulating The Moon and creating other cosmic events.
IS THE MOON A HOLLOWED-OUT SPACECRAFT SENT TO ORBIT OUR EARTH IN THE REMOTE PREHISTORIC PAST? INHABITED BY ALIEN SPACE TRAVELERS? Before you start laughing. You might want to read more.
When two leading Soviet scientists recently proposed this theory, shock waves reverberated throughout the entire scientific world. Now for the first time a book makes available the revelations that are causing a revolution in our knowledge of The Moon.
In July 1970, two Russian scientists, Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov, published an article in the Soviet journal Sputnik entitled “Is The Moon the Creation of Alien Intelligence?” They advanced the theory that The Moon is not a completely natural world, but a planetoid that was hollowed out in the far reaches of space by intelligent beings possessing a technology far superior to ours, using a comet to tow it to the Earth. Or maybe under its own power. Huge machines were used to melt rock and form large cavities within The Moon, spewing the molten refuse on the surface. Protected by a hull-like inner shell plus a reconstructed outer shell of metallic rocky junk, this gigantic craft was steered through the cosmos and finally parked in orbit around the Earth.
In their article Vasin and Shcherbakov wrote, “Abandoning the traditional paths of common sense, we have plunged into what may at first sight seem to be unbridled fantasy. The more minutely we go into all the information gathered about The Moon, the more we are convinced that there is not a single fact to rule out our supposition. Not only that, many things so far considered to be lunar enigmas are explainable in the light of this new hypothesis.”
Outrageous as the spacecraft Moon theory might first appear, consider how this model reconciles all the mysteries of The Moon. It explains why The Moon gives evidence of being older than the Earth and perhaps even our solar system and why there are three distinct layers within The Moon, with the densest materials on the outside layer, as one would expect of the “hull” of a spacecraft would be. It could also explain why no sign of water has been found on the Moon’s surface, yet there is evidence it exists deep inside. This theory also would explain the strange maria and mascons, perhaps the remnants of the machinery used to hollow out The Moon. The idea of an artificial satellite could explain the odd, rhythmic “moon quakes” as artificial constructs reacting the same way during periods of stress from the Earth’s pull. And artificial equipment beneath the Moon’s surface might be the source of the gas clouds that have been observed.
A scientist called Irwin I. Shapiro who works at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for astrophysics said, “Looking at all the anomaly’s and unanswered questions about The Moon, the best explanation for The Moon is observational error, it doesn’t exist” Irwin I. Shapiro is a respected figure in astrophysics, his research includes using gravitational lenses to assess the age of the universe.
A planet of our size with such a low gravitational field shouldn’t have such a big Moon. When we look at other planets with satellites, they are much larger than Earth, with a much stronger gravitational pull and their Moons are much smaller to them in comparison. From what I can see, our Moon is an anomaly, it shouldn’t be there. If Earth was to have a Moon it should be MUCH smaller, possibly 30 miles or so in diameter at the very most and not this giant in the sky that we see in the night.
If the precise and stationary orbit of The Moon is seen as sheer coincidence, is it also coincidence that The Moon is at just the right distance from the Earth to completely cover the Sun during an eclipse. While the diameter of The Moon is a mere 2,160 miles against the Sun’s gigantic 864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in just the right position to block out all but the Sun’s flaming corona when it moves between the Sun and the Earth. Asimov explained: “There is no astronomical reason why The Moon and the Sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion”.
Let’s consider the Moon’s orbit , it is nearly a perfect circle, but stationary, one side always facing the Earth with only the slightest variation. As far as we know, it’s the only natural satellite with such an orbit.
This circular orbit is especially odd considering that the Moon’s center of mass lies more than a mile closer to the Earth than its geometric center. This fact alone should produce an unstable, wobbly orbit, much like a ball with its mass off-center it will not roll in a straight line. Almost all the other satellites in our solar system orbit in the plane of their planet’s equator. Not so with The Moon, whose orbit lies strangely nearer the Earth’s orbit around the Sun or inclined to the Earth’s ecliptic by more than five degrees. Add to this that the Moon’s bulge, is located on the side facing away from Earth, thus negating the idea that it was caused by the Earth’s gravitational pull, makes for an off-balanced world.
Is it merely coincidence? How does one explain this and many other Moon mysteries?
” It is a shame that one small thing remains unaccounted for. One trifling thing I have ignored so far, WHAT IN BLAZES IS OUR MOON DOING WAY OUT THERE? It’s too far out to be a true satellite of Earth. It’s too BIG to have been CAPTURED by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and The Moon then having taken up a nearly circular orbit about the Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible”.
” But, then, if The Moon is neither a true satellite of the Earth nor a captured one, what is it? ” (Asimov on Astronomy Mercury Press, 1963.)
Over the years, it has been scientifically observed that the Earth’s Moon holds some strange characteristics. It is believed to have been created by a giant impact between the young Earth and a Mars-sized body. After examination, it has been noted that The Moon is apparently in the wrong orbit for its size, according to its current assumed density. Astronomy data indicates that the internal regions of The Moon are less dense than the outer, giving rise to the inevitable speculation that it could be hollow. Some of these claims come from the fact that when meteors strike the Moon, it rings like a bell. When the Apollo crew, on November 20, 1969, released the lunar module, after returning to the orbiter, the module impact with The Moon causing the seismic equipment to register a continuous reverberation for more than an hour.
The Moon is far older than previously expected, maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old, while Moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years. The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sit is remarkably different from the rocks themselves. This indicates that the lunar surface may have been moved from somewhere else and placed on The Moon. Some of the Moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that The Moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions. Hundreds of moon quakes are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. Some of the quakes seem to follow a specific schedule.
The moon’s crust is much harder than originally presumed. When NASA was recorded drilling down a few inches into the Moon’s surface, it appeared that metal shavings were visible. Earth’s Moon is the only natural satellite in the Solar System that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. How does one explain the coincidence that The Moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Professional astronomers have been gradually discouraged from investigating a phenomenon that has been reported on The Moon for 1,000 years. It is short-lived light, color, or other changes in the appearance of the lunar surface, referred to as Transient Lunar Phenomena.
Water on the Moon
Hydrogen shouldn’t exist on The Moon. None was detected in samples from the Apollo mission. Gravity holds it weakly, and individual hydrogen atoms or molecules would likely be lost to the vacuum of space. That’s true even at the frigid poles where cold hydrogen has little of the thermal energy that could bounce it into space. Hydrogen is more likely to stick around when bonded with other atoms into a chemical like water, methane or ammonia. But methane and ammonia would be gases in those cold lunar shadows, and thus would probably evaporate and disappear. That leaves water. Feldman, who designed the neutron spectrometer, says, “There is water on The Moon, I’m certain of that. It’s a question of how much.”
Scientists claim recent evidence of water on The Moon originated from deep within the lunar interior. According to a report from Space.com, NASA’s Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3) instrument detected what scientists refer to as “magmatic water,” confirming earlier analysis researchers performed on Moon rocks brought back to Earth nearly four decades ago.
Let’s say we start explaining the discovery of ice on The Moon by looking at the neutron spectrometer. After all, this is the instrument that sent those intriguing signals in the first place. This instrument analyzes neutrons, the uncharged particles, with positively charged protons, comprise atomic nuclei. The spectrometer measures neutrons that are formed when The Moon is bombarded by cosmic rays,(energetic gamma rays) from deep space.
When a ray strikes Moon dirt, it kicks loose high energy neutrons. If these neutrons collide with other atoms in the soil, they may be bounced into space. A few of those will enter Prospector’s neutron spectrometer, which measures their energy. Each time a neutron bounces against something, it loses some energy. Thus, its energy, or spectrum depends on its history of bounces.
Helium 3 on the Moon
Materials on the Moon‘s surface contain helium-3 at concentrations on the order of between 1.4 and 15 ppb in sunlit area and may contain concentrations as much as 50 ppb in permanently shadowed regions.
Current US industrial consumption of helium-3 is approximately 60,000 liters (approximately 8 kg) per year; cost at auction has typically been approximately $100/liter although increasing demand has raised prices to as much as $2,000/liter in recent years. If there’s money to be made. One can bet the corporations will make a bee line to rape The Moon.
Helium-3 (He-3) is a light, non-radioactiveisotope of helium with two protons and one neutron. It is rare on Earth, and it is sought for use in nuclear fusion research. The abundance of helium-3 is thought to be greater on the Moon (embedded in the upper layer of regolith by the solar wind over billions of years), though still low in quantity (28 ppm of lunar regolith is helium-4 and from one ppb to 50 ppb is helium-3), and the solar system‘s gas giants (left over from the original solar nebula).
Although helium-3 was found to be about 10,000 times rarer than helium-4 in the helium from gas wells, its significant presence in underground gas deposits implied that either it did not decay, or else it had a very long half-life, billions of years. Hydrogen-1 and helium-3 are the only stable nuclides that contain more protons than neutrons.
Mathematical Impossibilities of the Moon
Another impossibility that has always been an embarrassment to the scientific establishment is the obvious fact that an object as heavy as The Moon, caught in the earth’s gravity, would inevitably come crashing down upon us at immense speeds. Responses to this argument from the Lunarists have always been weak, and always couched in that scientific news speak designed to confuse the sincere questioner without actually saying anything.
The establishment most often cites the work of Isaac Newton in support of its story. Newton is well-known for coming up with entirely theoretical notions such as the Law of Universal Gravitation, and his more famous Laws of Motion which serve to gloss over the more obvious inconsistencies in The Moon story. Less known for is his “extra-curricular” pursuits, which he kept secret during his lifetime which have since been uncovered. Newton was a dominating figure in the Royal Society, a fellowship riddled with members of the various secret societies whose goal to dominate the world has already been outlined. Newton himself possessed copies of Rosicrucian manifestos, and, is clear in his notes, had studied them thoroughly. Many of his biographers suspect that he shared the religious beliefs of many of his colleagues. It does not take a genius to conclude that these beliefs may have influenced his scientific reasoning.
The majority of scientists and professors of most universities are members of organizations such as these, as are most of the scientists who work for NASA. Those that are not realize that their livelihood depends on towing the establishment line, and only a few have had the courage to speak out.
However, eminent scientists, working in defiance of the establishment, have proven conclusively, using the most scrupulous methods, that if an object such as The Moon really existed, it could not remain fixed in the sky for very long. Proactive arguments in support of this finding return to a closer examination of the original mathematical formula generally referenced when rallying to solidify the moon’s improbable existence:
F = GMm/r2
Where F = gravitational attraction
G = the gravitational constant
M= mass of one body
m = mass of the second body
r= distance between the two bodies
Established by Newton himself, this numerical gem is based completely on the assumption that The Moon travels in concentric circles around our planet. F (the gravitational attraction holding The Moon to its “true” path) requires that r (the distance between the two celestial bodies) remains constant. Should the distance, r, decrease at any given moment, the gravitational force will increase in strength.
When this event occurs The Moon will be pulled towards this planet. According to Newton’s theory that a body set in motion remains in motion, such an incident would initiate a logical series of events with a singular chaotic result. Propagated drawing of satellite to planet until the two massive bodies collide.
However, even the most fanatical Lunarists no longer cling to the absurd notion that objects in the solar system travel in concentric circles. These so-called “scientists” have changed their story so many times, who knows what to believe anymore? The now fashionable dogma is that the route followed by celestial bodies is not circular but a concave oval with the origin point at the center (in the case of the earth, the sun; in the case of The Moon, the earth) followed by a spiraling series of pathways. Thus, The Moon is not maintaining a constant distance from our planet. Our orbiting satellite is forever oscillating towards us, drawing near then distant, in a continuous cycle. Each successive approach brings this massive wonder closer to our midst.
In other words, The Moon does indeed alter its distance from the earth. So why is it not widespread knowledge that the end, mathematically predicated BY NEWTON’S OWN FORMULA, has been anticipated and is drawing near? Due to some irrational explanation The Moon has managed to defy those very laws of physics that were originally developed to prove its existence.
After hundreds of years of detailed observation and study, our closest companion in the vast universe, Earth’s Moon, remains an enigma. Six moon landings and hundreds of experiments have resulted in more questions being asked than answered.
1.) Moon’s Age: The moon is far older than previously expected. Maybe even older than the Earth or the Sun. The oldest age for the Earth is estimated to be 4.6 billion years old; Moon rocks were dated at 5.3 billion years old, and the dust upon which they were resting was at least another billion years older.
2.) Rock’s Origin: The chemical composition of the dust upon which the rocks sat differed remarkably from the rocks themselves, contrary to accepted theories that the dust resulted from weathering and breakup of the rocks themselves. The rocks had to have come from somewhere else.
3.) Heavier Elements on Surface: Normal planetary composition results in heavier elements in the core and lighter materials at the surface; not so with The Moon. The abundance of refractory elements like titanium in the surface areas is so pronounced that several geologists proposed the refractory compounds were brought to the moon’s surface in great quantity in some unknown way. They don’t know how, but that it was done cannot be questioned. So let’s not say anything.
4.) Water Vapor: On March 7, 1971, lunar instruments placed by the astronauts recorded a vapor cloud of water passing across the surface of The Moon. The cloud lasted 14 hours and covered an area of about 100 square miles.
5.) Magnetic Rocks: Moon rocks were magnetized. This is odd because there is no magnetic field on The Moon itself. This could not have originated from a “close call” with Earth, as such an encounter would have ripped The Moon apart.
6.) No Volcanoes: Some of the moon’s craters originated internally, yet there is no indication that The Moon was ever hot enough to produce volcanic eruptions.
7.) Moon Mascons: Mascons, which are large, dense, circular masses lying twenty to forty miles beneath the centers of the moon’s maria, are broad, disk-shaped objects that could be possibly an artificial construction. For huge circular disks are not likely to be beneath each huge maria, centered like bull’s-eyes in the middle of each, by coincidence or accident.
8.) Seismic Activity: Hundreds of Moon quakes are recorded each year that cannot be attributed to meteor strikes. In November, 1958, Soviet astronomer Nikolay A. Kozyrev of the Crimean Astrophysical Observatory photographed a gaseous eruption of The Moon near the crater Alphonsus. He also detected a reddish glow that lasted for about an hour. In 1963, astronomers at the Lowell Observatory also saw reddish glows on the crests of ridges in the Aristarchus region. These observations have proved to be precisely identical and periodical, repeating themselves as The Moon moves closer to the Earth. These are probably not natural phenomena.
9.) Hollow Moon: The Moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) where the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean? In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of The Moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.” Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the Moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside The Moon where is “simply a cavity.” MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the Moon’s gravitational field. Indicating the possibility that The Moon might be hollow.” In Carl Sagan’s treatise, Intelligent Life in the Universe, the famous astronomer stated, “A natural satellite cannot be a hollow object.”
10.) Moon Echoes: On November 20, 1969, the Apollo 12 crew jettisoned the lunar module ascent stage causing it to crash to the Moon. The LM’s impact (about 40 miles from the Apollo 12 landing site) created an artificial Moon quake with startling characteristics. The Moon reverberated like a bell for more than an hour. This phenomenon was repeated with Apollo 13 (intentionally commanding the third stage to impact The Moon), with even more startling results. Seismic instruments recorded that the reverberations lasted for three hours and twenty minutes and traveled to a depth of twenty-five miles, leading to the conclusion that The Moon has an unusually light, or has no core.
11.) Unusual Metals: The Moon’s crust is much harder than presumed. Remember the extreme difficulty the astronauts encountered when they tried to drill into the maria? Surprise! The maria is composed primarily illeminite, a mineral containing large amounts of titanium, the same metal used to fabricate the hulls of deep-diving submarines and the skin of the SR-71 “Blackbird”.
Additional Moon Mysteries
Uranium 236 and neptunium 237 (elements not found in nature on Earth) were discovered in lunar rocks, so was rust-proof iron particles.
12.) Moon’s Origin: Before the astronauts’ Moon rocks conclusively disproved the theory, the Moon was believed to have originated when a chunk of Earth broke off eons ago. Another theory was the Moon was created from leftover “space dust” remaining after the Earth was created. Analysis of the composition of Moon rocks disproved this theory also. Another popular theory is The Moon was somehow “captured” by the Earth’s gravitational attraction. But no evidence exists to support this theory. Isaac Asimov, stated, “It’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and The Moon then having taken up nearly circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible.
13.) “Weird Orbit: Our Moon is the only Moon in the solar system that has a stationary, near-perfect circular orbit. Stranger still, the Moon’s center of mass is about 6000 feet closer to the Earth than its geometric center (which should cause wobbling), but the Moon’s bulge is on the far side of The Moon, away from the Earth. “Something” had to put The Moon in orbit with its precise altitude, course, and speed.
14.) Moon Diameter: How does one explain the “coincidence” that The Moon is just the right distance, coupled with just the right diameter, to completely cover the sun during an eclipse? Again, Isaac Asimov responds, “There is no astronomical reason why The Moon and the sun should fit so well. It is the sheerest of coincidences, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this fashion.”
15.) Spaceship Moon: As outrageous as The Moon Spacecraft Theory is, all the above items are resolved if one assumes that The Moon is a gigantic extraterrestrial craft, brought here eons ago by intelligent beings. This is the only theory that is supported by all the data, and there are no data that contradict this theory.
Well the craters can’t be only from impacts because many craters seem so shallow despite their size. Many scientists still wonder about this and based on the impact and size across the craters, the depth should be 4 to 6 times that deep. They defy known science. Take Bailly for example. This crater is about 303 miles across but only 4 to 5 miles deep.
The Moon is extremely dry and does not appear to have ever had water in any substantial amounts. None of The Moon rocks, regardless of where they were found, contained free water or even water molecules bound into the minerals. Yet Apollo 16 astronauts found Moon rocks that contained bits of rusted iron. Since oxidation requires oxygen and free hydrogen, this rust indicates there must be water somewhere on The Moon.
Experts were surprised to find lunar rocks bearing brass, mica and amphibole in addition to the near-pure titanium. Uranium 236 and Neptunium 237, elements not previously found in nature, were discovered in Moon rocks, according to the Argone National Laboratory. While still trying to explain the presence of these materials, scientists were further startled to learn of rust-proof iron particles in a soil sample from the Sea of Crisis. In 1976, the Associated Press reported that the Soviets had announced the discovery of iron particles that “do not rust” in samples brought back by an unmanned Moon mission in 1970. Iron that does not rust is unknown in nature and well beyond present Earth technology.
In fact, the spacecraft Moon theory may come closer than any other in reconciling the questions over the origin and amazing orbit of The Moon. But we are not supposed to consider this thesis. The circular logic of modern science about the origins of The Moon runs something like this. We know that extraterrestrials don’t exist but we do know that The Moon exists and has been mentioned throughout human history. We humans did not create it or place it in Earth’s orbit, so it must have been done by extraterrestrials. But since we know they don’t exist, we will simply call it an anomaly and will not publicly say anything more about this. That’s Reason for you.
The authorities expect us to simply take at their word the absurd and unfounded story that there is a large mass orbiting the earth. Obviously we are expected to be mere sheeple, going along with the Thought Police. However, when one looks at THE FACTS, in an atmosphere of free thought from bias and academic repression, one sees a very different story.
Regardless what one believes about The Moon, one has to admit. The Moon is Mysterious.
Knowledge is Power
Experience is Wisdom
Take your Power Back
Spacecraft Moon, Let’s take a ride!
If interested in other Moon studies use the links below.
Moon Landings were they faked. http://www.thisblogrules.com/2013/09/10-controversial-points-about-the-moon-landings.html
Strange structures on the Moon.http://lunar-anomalies.blogspot.com/2011/07/lunar-colonies-and-towers.html
Moon Rising Video http://vimeo.com/55184336
Who Built the Moon https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OJwj-ySngho
Hollow Earth Theory http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/esp_tierra_hueca.htm